Shahbaz Sharif’s nomination papers rejected

Posted by Teeth Maestro

December 1, 2007

| More

If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic. You may also join the Teeth Maestro Facebook Page

The Returning Officer Ashtar Abbas rejected the nomination papers Mian Shahbaz Sharif for one National Assembly (NA 119) seat and two Provincial Assembly (PP 141 and PP 142) seats. Tariq Badaruddin Banday, a candidate from NA 119 filed objection against nomination papers of Shahbaz Sharif that the brother of Nawaz Sharif was a bank defaulter. He submitted documents showing Shahbaz a defaulter of Rs 12 million. It must be noted that the nomination papers of Shahbaz Sharif’s son Hamza Shahbaz have already been accepted for above mentioned three constituencies.

While unsurprisingly the papers of Benazir Bhutto who has twice been thrown out of power because of corruption still stands to contest in the elections. Free and Fair, yeah right

Tags: BB, Benazir, CrisisPk, Election, Nawaz Sharif, PPP, Shahbaz Sharif
Comment Meta: Leave a comment | Subscribe to the Comment Feed | Upload your Comment Image

2 Responses to “Shahbaz Sharif’s nomination papers rejected”

1

Shoiab Safdar says:

December 1, 2007 at 11:24 pm

election are free for Musharraf’s party/es and full of fear for the rest Opposition! ok.
free & fear!

Reply
2

Faisalk says:

December 2, 2007 at 12:15 am

Still just for a brief millisecond of a second, it made my heart swell with pride that a bank defaulter was not allowed to contest elections. Amazingly…what exactly is the said bank doing to recover its 12 million Rs as those of the books are known to be ruthless with claim departments and all. Oh right.. thats just for people who are 2 days late in their credit card payments…story of our country!

Reply

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

_{Comment Policy: Moderating comments is a very difficult thing to enforce and we do not like to stop anyone's opinion no matter how bizarre it might be. The general trend of this blog has been that we never censor comments based on political or ideological point of view. But to bring a little sanity in the debate we strongly frown upon comments that are abusive, off-topic, use foul language, resort to racial attacks, use caps-locks, habitual flamers are shown the door especially those commenters who resort to ad hominem attacks are definitely deleted when caught. Simply said, if you can carry a civilized discussion then the floor is open to your hearts desire. But, we still reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem inappropriate without reason}