POLL: Who would you blame for the Lahore Attacks
With so many conspiracy theories floating about, who in your opinion is to blame for the Lahore attack on the Sri Lankan players today
[poll id="5"]
Tags: ISI, Long March, RAW, Zardari
Comment Meta: Leave a comment | Subscribe to the Comment Feed | Upload your Comment Image
Comment Meta: Leave a comment | Subscribe to the Comment Feed | Upload your Comment Image
Thanks for bringing some common sense into the conversation, Fatima.
Fatima,
Same can be said about Denial, if he dosn’t like Dr Jawwad’s comments, he shouldn’t read them. Same goes to you too, if you don’t like Dr Jawwad’s comments don’t read them.
BTW, who give you the right to question Dr Jawwad’s becoming a doctor? Looking like you are an authority yourself and then dictacting others to behave according to your standards. Who is a hypcrite here?
Fatima
You are right.
If someone doesnt like something, they should not forced.
They should have freedom to chose or not to continue.
Can you give that right to Muslims who want to leave Islam or do they have to be killed as per Koran ??
I thought only mafia did that..
sam_sc95051@yahoo.com
Sam,
So in your religion your father can sleep with your sister as long as both have no issue with that?
Who are you to criticise other people’s religions, Arif, when your religion allows men to marry children and have sex with them. That’s right, the top Saudi cleric recently ruled that it is perfectly alright for Muslims to marry children (children who are not even aware of what sex is); in fact, the cleric said, we are doing them a favour!
So don’t throw stones from your glass house of morals.
And about your point on why I shouldn’t read Dr Jawwad’s posts, the whole point of a blog and a comments section is to have a conversation. That involves everyone expressing their views and then debating them.
My point is simple: I respect Dr Jawwad’s right to say what he wants. It’s just that he doesn’t respect my right to do the same. So while he upholds Islam by using gutter language, apparently I’m the evil one for having a civilised tone. Heh, you lot are serious hypocrites.
Arif,
I am not going get upset by your questions. So relax.
Also please comment on this link.
====================================
Fatwa against Cricket in Pakistan ??
So all of you, who are true muslims must stop playing cricket now.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25144579-25837,00.html
Islamists wage war against cricket, ‘the other religion’
Sam,
You didn’t answer the question. What happent to consent?
You can any question.
No one should stop you from doing that.
Same for me. Also No can force me to answer any question.
Same of for you.
You can ask any question Arif
No one should stop you from doing that.
Same for me.
Also no one can force me to answer any question or if i am not knowledgeable i will not answer
Dan, what do you smoke?
You can crictize Islam, Sam can critize Islam, Fatima can critize Islam, Any one can critize Islam but I can not criticize your religion…wowwww…. What a hypcrite SOB you are.
You are like those thugs, who would appreciate any thing against Islam in the name of Free Speech, but as soon as a person questions holocast he is termed as Anti-semite and treated as a criminal.
I’m glad that you are insignificant otherwise it would be hard for humans to live and breath on this earth.
Common Sense Point number 1 for Danial: The top cleric of Saudi Arabia is not representative of Islam. His word is not set in stone. If he tells me to go jump off a cliff, doesn’t mean I jump off a cliff. Its up to an individual how to interpret divine verses. The onus of reflecting and acting rests on the person. That cleric isn’t responsible for jack. Certainly not my actions. There is no logic in holding an entire faith accountable for the poor scholarship of some cleric in Saudi Arabia.
Common Sense Point 2 for Arif: Yes, you are right. I am a hypocrite. I want to impose my standards of tolerance on Dr. Jawwad. God forbid, we don’t want tolerance in this country. We’re doing just great without it. No?
Fortunately, for me, this conversation is getting immensely childish. I’ll take my leave now. Good luck, fellas! Have fun scoring points over each other. Because, God forbid, we don’t want listening and learning to be part of the conversation. We’re doing just great without it. No?
Fatima,
Certainly you can interpret things in your way.
No one should stop you.
Are you more qualified than cleric’s in Saudi Arabia, Iran, …so many places..
If you think so, please tell us how you are more qualified than them.
But we have to respect and listen to people who are experts or spent a lot more time in their areas.
Seems to be work of Talibans and Jehadis supported by Imran Khan.
http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/Dawn%20Content%20Library/dawn/news/pakistan/investigators+see+let+footprints+in+lahore+attack–sal-up
@jaram!
people differ when they interprete revelation given by GOD and prophets on the basis of knowledge they have. this is the way human do.chiristianity,judism,muslims.there are/were many sect in every religion just because of interpretation.
tell me what is the no of gods in hinduism?
some say that it is approximately 330 millions.
why there isn’t one common God in hindumat?
because of interpretation.
if you are a grown up man than you should realize that, when it comes to religion one should not question the religion on basis of different interpretations or disputed interpretations.
in the religion question should be asked on the issues where all the followers are agreed on certain issues.
for example in case of islam question should be asked about ALLAH(SWT) and HIS divine absolute power,PROPHETS, judgement day etc
if you satisfied with the answer then we could move forward otherwise the discussion would end
also i want to ask you to be a gentleman.gentlemen do not attack on the others belief they just discuss.
what you did is just searched the question which you thought that muslims might not give the answer and asked just to confuse them.
and when i gave the answer inspite of having the serious discussion on the answer you brought a different version on that particular issue which is not practiced in the subcontinent.
so please correct you approach.
teasing other is not a good habbit.
be a gentleman and let us be gentlmen.
Fatima,
You are not ready to accept the Top learned man or cleric’s in Islam. You disapprove of them.
Certainly the top cleric for marriage authority cannot be ignorant or illiterate when interpreting that Prophet Mohammed married a 6 year old girl.
When Mohamamed had sex with Ayesha, she was only 9 yrd old and he was somewhere between 54-60yrs old.
That cleric must have consulted (if he himself is not knowledgeable) before he talked on telivision.
It is not just him.
If i have time, I will post more links, where other learned Islamic scholars also agree with that view.
I don’t think you are a true muslim, because you want some of your own personal version.
If you want your version, you should be able to justify or show proof that the cleric is wrong.
@fatima!
freedom of speech….it is beyond my comprehension.
there is two ways one can ask the question.for example i ask the question about your mother that:
1) what was the age of your mother when she got married?
this is a simple and innocent question.
but i can ask the other way that:
2) what was the age of your mother when your father had a sex with her?
this is the most disgusting and obnoxious way of asking the question.so tell me
would you allow me to ask this way in the name of freedom of speech?
if you can not allow any one to ask the question in a highly inflammable way about person you love and have a respect,then how we can allow any SOB to ask about the personalities we deeply love and revere more than our parents.
it is not the freedom of speech.it is hostility against islam.
@jaram
here is the proof.
THE AGE OF HAZRAT AYESHA (RA) WHEN HER MARRIAGE WAS CONSUMMATED.(taken from the text)
It is normally believed that she was nine years old at the time of her marriage with Mohammad (sws) was consummated. I do think it was according to the traditions of the Arab culture, as otherwise people would have objected to this marriage. But unfortunately, the modern day man is not satisfied with an answer as simple as that.
Answer:
To begin with[1], I think it is the responsibility of all those who believe that marrying a girl as young as nine years old was an accepted norm of the Arab culture, to provide at least a few examples to substantiate their point of view. I have not yet been able to find a single reliable instance in the books of Arab history where a girl as young as nine years old was given away in marriage. Unless such examples are given, we do not have any reasonable grounds to believe that it really was an accepted norm.
In my opinion, the age of Ayesha (ra) has been grossly misreported in the narratives of the incident. Not only that, I think that the narratives reporting this event are not only highly unreliable but also that on the basis of other historical data, the event reported, is quite an unlikely happening. Let us look at the issue from an objective stand point. My reservations in accepting the narratives, on the basis of which, Ayesha’s (ra) age at the time of her marriage with the Prophet (pbuh) is held to be nine years are:
*
Most of these narratives are reported only by Hisham ibn `urwah reporting on the authority of his father. An event as well known as the one being reported, should logically have been reported by more people than just one, two or three.
*
It is quite strange that no one from Medinah, where Hisham ibn `urwah lived the first seventy-one years of his life has narrated the event, even though in Medinah his pupils included people as well known as Malik ibn Anas. All the narratives of this event have been reported by narrators from Iraq, where Hisham is reported to have shifted after living in Medinah for seventy-one years.
*
Tehzeeb al-Tehzeeb, one of the most well known books on the life and reliability of the narrators of the traditions ascribed to the Prophet (pbuh) reports that according to Yaqub ibn Shaibah: “narratives reported by Hisham are reliable except those that are reported through the people of Iraq”. It further states that Malik ibn Anas objected on those narratives of Hisham, which were reported through people of Iraq (Vol. 11, pg. 48 – 51).
*
Meezaan al-Ai`tidaal, another book on the narrators of the traditions of the Prophet (pbuh) reports that when he was old, Hisham’s memory suffered quite badly (Vol. 4, pg. 301 – 302).
*
According to the generally accepted tradition, Ayesha (ra) was born about eight years before Hijrah. However, according to another narrative in Bukhari (Kitaab al-Tafseer) Ayesha (ra) is reported to have said that at the time Surah Al-Qamar, the 54th chapter of the Qur’an , was revealed, “I was a young girl”. The 54th Surah of the Qur’an was revealed nine years before Hijrah. According to this tradition, Ayesha (ra) had not only been born before the revelation of the referred Surah, but was actually a young girl (jariyah), not even only an infant (sibyah) at that time. Obviously, if this narrative is held to be true, it is in clear contradiction with the narratives reported by Hisham ibn `urwah. I see absolutely no reason that after the comments of the experts on the narratives of Hisham ibn `urwah, why should we not accept this narrative to be more accurate.
*
According to a number of narratives, Ayesha (ra) accompanied the Muslims in the battle of Badr and Uhud. Furthermore, it is also reported in books of hadith and history that no one under the age of 15 years was allowed to take part in the battle of Uhud. All the boys below 15 years of age were sent back. Ayesha’s (ra) participation in the battle of Badr and Uhud clearly indicates that she was not nine or ten years old at that time. After all, women used to accompany men to the battlefields to help them, not to be a burden upon them.
*
According to almost all the historians Asma (ra), the elder sister of Ayesha (ra) was ten years older than Ayesha (ra). It is reported in Taqreeb al-Tehzeeb as well as Al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah that Asma (ra) died in the 73rd year after hijrah[2] when she was 100 years old. Now, obviously if Asma (ra) was 100 years old in the 73rd year after hijrah, she should have been 27 or 28 years old at the time of hijrah. If Asma (ra) was 27 or 28 years old at the time of hijrah, Ayesha (ra) should have been 17 or 18 years old at that time. Thus, Ayesha (ra) – if she got married in 1 AH (after hijrah) or 2 AH – was between 18 to 20 years old at the time of her marriage.
*
Tabari in his treatise on Islamic history, while mentioning Abu Bakr (ra) reports that Abu Bakr had four children and all four were born during the Jahiliyyah – the pre Islamic period. Obviously, if Ayesha (ra) was born in the period of jahiliyyah, she could not have been less than 14 years in 1 AH – the time she most likely got married.
*
According to Ibn Hisham, the historian, Ayesha (ra) accepted Islam quite some time before Umar ibn Khattab (ra). This shows that Ayesha (ra) accepted Islam during the first year of Islam. While, if the narrative of Ayesha’s (ra) marriage at seven years of age is held to be true, Ayesha (ra) should not even have been born during the first year of Islam.
*
Tabari has also reported that at the time Abu Bakr (ra) planned on migrating to Habshah (8 years before Hijrah), he went to Mut`am – with whose son Ayesha (ra) was engaged at that time – and asked him to take Ayesha (ra) in his house as his son’s wife. Mut`am refused, because Abu Bakr had embraced Islam. Subsequently, his son divorced Ayesha (ra). Now, if Ayesha (ra) was only seven years old at the time of her marriage, she could not have been born at the time Abu Bakr decided on migrating to Habshah. On the basis of this report it seems only reasonable to assume that Ayesha (ra) had not only been born 8 years before hijrah, but was also a young lady, quite prepared for marriage.
*
According to a narrative reported by Ahmad ibn Hanbal, after the death of Khadijah (ra), when Khaulah (ra) came to the Prophet (pbuh) advising him to marry again, the Prophet (pbuh) asked her regarding the choices she had in her mind. Khaulah said: “You can marry a virgin (bikr) or a woman who has already been married (thayyib)”. When the Prophet (pbuh) asked about who the virgin was, Khaulah proposed Ayesha’s (ra) name. All those who know the Arabic language, are aware that the word “bikr” in the Arabic language is not used for an immature nine-year old girl. The correct word for a young playful girl, as stated earlier is “Jariyah”. “Bikr” on the other hand, is used for an unmarried lady, and obviously a nine year old is not a “lady”.
*
According to Ibn Hajar, Fatimah (ra) was five years older than Ayesha (ra). Fatimah (ra) is reported to have been born when the Prophet (pbuh) was 35 years old. Thus, even if this information is taken to be correct, Ayesha (ra) could by no means be less than 14 years old at the time of hijrah, and 15 or 16 years old at the time of her marriage.
These are some of the major points that go against accepting the commonly known narrative regarding Ayesha’s (ra) age at the time of her marriage.
In my opinion, neither was it an Arab tradition to give away girls in marriage at an age as young as nine or ten years, nor did the Prophet (pbuh) marry Ayesha (ra) at such a young age. The people of Arabia did not object to this marriage, because it never happened in the manner it has been narrated.
@jaram
prove it wrong with reasons if you have any. not by filthy language.
tell me what is your research?
please provide us the text and refrences not the links?
do you have counter arguments against the text i presented to you?
jawwad,
You are not agreeing with top cleric or Marriage official from Saudi Arabia.
So contest what he says.
You are not arguing against me.
If it is filthy, he would not have talked about this subject at all.
It
yes we do not agree with them on this issue.
because the muslims of subcontinent rely on the interpretation of IMAM abu HANEEFA while saudi rely on the interpretation of IMAM AHMED BIN HANBAL.
1) i have no problem with their interpretation as it is just a discussion based on the knowledge they got from their ancestors.
i am living in saudia since 8 yrs and i never saw a single marriage of 9 yr old girl.
what you saw is not a practice in saudia it is merely a discussion of possibilities based on the knowledge they received.
2) i asked fatima a question on freedom of speech please read it and tell me what is your answer.
3) it is you(not the saudi cleric) who jumped in a middle of a discussion on another topic and started asking the question in a very inflammable way.
and i gave you the answer. now:
1) either you do some research and prove me wrong with the reasearch based facts (as you raise the issue)
2)or keep quite.(put up or shut up)
I rely on the real and authentic scholars of islam, where the Holy sites are.
Not from a far away place, as the real message could have been corrupted by the time it reached there.
I would consider the islam interpreted and practices as the pure form.
Everyone else have moved away from the original message.
Dr Jawwad,
Why are you wasting your time? This retard with the alias SAM, doesn’t care for Saudi Ulema or Pakistani Ulema. He is just trying to confuse Muslims. Ignore jack a$$es like him, and don’t waste your energy chatting with these idiots.
This thread is not about Muhammad(S.A.W.W), it’s about the terrorism committed in Lahore.
To understand Pakistan, we have to understand Islam.
To understand Islam, one of the things is to understand Mohammed’s life.
Mohammed’s life is ideal. so most muslims want live like him.
For example ayotollah khomeini in iran, passed a law where a girl 9yrs old can be legally be married.
So this is one of the examples.
Same things. To understand Taliban, we need to understand related things.
@junaid!
true! i know this tactic.i also know this guy since few month.yes i know that we have been deviated.it happens all the time when ever we discuss any issue which is related to the india/pakistan,islam or taliban, they appear with this maneuver with the help of pakistani freaks chanting about secularism,taunting and attacking the faith of the others like a clown.i bet these freaks do not even know the meaning of secularism or freedom of speech.the hatred and disgustingness against the islam is the only reason behind their comments on these forum.
i know i am wasting my time.it will not change any thing but the last thing i let the common innocent pakistani to take is the impression that these freaks have a knowledge,they have valid arguments while the islamist do not.i wont let them celebrate the triumph.
best regards
@jaram!
i asked you to refute the text with the reason and knowledge based facts, but again you showed us the example of the others.
REFUTE MY ARGUMENTS WITH THE TEXT NOT WITH THE EXAMPLES.
every body knows that saudia,iran and pakistan have a different religious schools of thoughts.
i just asked you to please prove me that my school of thought is wrong.
simple
still waiting for answers..
i think in your heart you know, you cannot answer.
so are you giving up so soon ??
i am talking about true islam, as it is interpreted and practices in Saudi arabia, iran…
I did not ask you about the interpretation in pakistan or som eother country.
the reason Saudi is because it is the holy land for islam and there are lot of scholars.
the reason iran, is because they have the biggest shia population.
every one else are far away from the islam’s holy lands.
so the farther you are from mecca/medina, islam is less understood or not as pure.
i have already given the ANSWER.because you asked the question….right
now prove that my answer is wrong.
its your turn.
as i told you that i never saw a single marriage of a 9 year old girl in saudia in 8 year.this is not the practice in saudia.i am sure in iran they also do not practice.
what they just say is based on the knowledge they received from their ancestors.we do not agree with them because we believe that knowledge they received is not reliable because the narrator of the hadeeth was suffering from dementia or similar disorder and we proved it.
also we used the history to identify the real age of UMMUL MOMINEEN at the time of consummation.
so please stop the childish caviling and tell me where we are wrong in these arguments?
REFUTE the arguments.i am getting impression that you have zero knowledge about this whole issue,you just heard about this issue and you raised the issue just to tease the muslims.
prove me that you have significant knowledge on this subject.
so are you saying that some hadiths may not be real, due to any other reason (like what you said dementia,…)
can you list them, so we know which ones are accurate and which ones are not ?
so what is the difference between a member of mafia who wants to leave the group and gets killed and an ex-muslim (who could be killed legally)…
why did slavery legal and permitted in islam ?
1) hadith is a very difficult and complicated subject only aalim e deen who studied more than 8 years can decide which hadeeth is authentic and which is not.we take guidance from them.
2) punishment of apostasy is have already given the answer on March 5, 2009 @ 2:28 pm
3) The Position Of Slavery In Islam (by syed abul aala modudi)
Islam tried to solve the problem of the slaves that were already in Arabia by encouraging people to set them free. Muslims were told that freeing slaves would mean the expiation of some of their sins. Freeing a slave of one’s own free will was declared to be an act of such great merit that the limbs of the man who manumitted a slave would be protected from hell-fire-one for each limb of the slave freed.
The result of this policy was that , by the time the period of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs was reached, all the old slaves of Arabia had been liberated. The Prophet (blessings of Allah and peace be upon him) alone liberated as many as 63 slaves. The number of slaves freed by }’isha was 67; Abbasliberated 70; }Abd Allahbin }Umar liberated one thousand; and }Abd al-Rahmnpurchased thirty thousand and set them free. Other Companions of the Prophet liberated a large number of slaves, the details of which are given in the Traditions and books of history of that period.
The problem of the slaves of Arabia was thus solved in under 40 years. After this the only slaves left in Islamic society were prisoners of war captured on the battlefield. These were kept by the Muslim government in question until their own government agreed to receive them back in exchange for Muslim soldiers they captured by them or arranged the payment of ransom on their behalf. If the soldiers they captured were not exchanged for Muslim prisoners of war, or their people did not pay their ransom money to purchase their liberty, the Muslim government distributed them among the soldiers of the army which had captured them.
This was a more humane way of disposing of them than penning them like cattle in concentration camps and taking forced labour from them and, if their womenfolk were also captured, setting them aside for prostitution. Islam preferred to spread them through the population and thus being them in contact with individual human beings. Their guardians, in addition, were ordered to treat them well.
The result of this policy was that most of the men who were captured on foreign battlefields and brought to the Muslim countries as slaves embraced Islam and their descendants produced great scholars, imams, jurists, commentators, statesmen and generals. So much so that later they became rulers of the Muslim world.
Today, prisoners of war throughout the world are exchanged on the cessation of hostilities. This is a practice which has been learnt from Islam. But treating well prisoners who cannot, for one reason or another, be exchanged, has not been learnt. Can anyone tell us, for example, the fate of the thousands of prisoners of war captured by Russia from the defeated armies of Germany and Japan in the Second World War? No one knows how many thousands of them are still alive and how many thousands of them perished due to the hardships of the Russian concentration and labour camps. It is doubtful if, even in the times of the ancient Pharaohs of Egypt, such harsh labour was exacted from the slaves who built the pyramids as was exacted from the prisoners of war in Russia who developed Siberia and other backward areas of the country
Jawwad,
thank you for taking time to explain your point of view. I have a better understanding, because of your time and effort in typing these.
But there is no point in discussing with you.
Some times you talk about absolute morals and sometimes relative morals, some times historic morals, sometimes morals which suit you, and of course sometimes no morals (blatant fascist idealogy).
and you have convenient interpretations or convenient assumptions.
Still my questions are, in a live and let live society you cannot have
1. Death upon changing religion
2. Different value for man or woman or for different religious groups.. you never answered why it can be justified 1 muslim=32 hindus from blood money in saudi.
3. Slavery is acceptable (parts of slavery in arabia are abolished by british. it was legal until 1963)
4. 54 yr old man marrying a 6yr child.
5. Dhimmi status for anyone who is not a muslim, legally as per koran.
6. religious apartheid in historically jewish lands.
for example before islam, mecca and medinah were jewish.
so all muslims should at the minimum allow them back. even better they should give them back to them and vacate those places.
i can go on and on..
i can say your values may be acceptable in a certain point of human history.
I wish i have a time machine and for people who like certain values i can send the bamck in time to that century or time to suit them.
Good bye
I THINK LTTE OR TALIBAN OR LeT IS BEHIND THIS.
http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/Dawn%20Content%20Library/dawn/news/pakistan/investigators+see+let+footprints+in+lahore+attack–sal-up ……. alright , atleast pakistan media accepts , its an act dine by Let or some other extremist group . why and how would they find proof if this has not been done by RAW .. also the most funniest thing i find that not even a single terrorist could be captured ????????????? why because pak security forces were saving their a***** watching incident with their open(rather closed) eyes and enjoying that ?? atleast we in mumbai fought with them , captured them .
Old “Indian” saying
Intellectuals think 100 times and then speak once, fools speak 100 times and then think at last…
my addition :- Pakistani speaks 1000 times and never thinks at all. :-)
Leaders of Pakistan and its general public seems to be in delusion and denials for 3 Generations now !!
One simple example , “”name a world leader, a single one, who keeps Mohammad Ali Jinnah ’s teachings/Photos” along with him or in his office for inspiration and the look at “M.K. Gandhi ’s / Rabindranath Tagore ’s “Fan following..
Dude you (Pakistanis) are not even acceptable to world and people openly have called you International Migraine, there should be some limits of uselessness, you are destroying the name of SE-Asia.
I really have no words to Explain when we Blamed U guys we had Enough Evidence But U guys were just talkin in air its just because all ur political leaders get more vote if u guys blame us for everything does not matter even if u guys have proof or not. Its Pakistanis mistake that they gave support To Taliban and other terrorist party now u guys are scared of the consequences wake up and try making ur Country a better place to live otherwise be ready to be wiped out of world map and yah blaming Indian Intelligence will fetch u guys nothing because we can screw Pakistan’s army right center and middle and we proved it not once u lost all the battle. we don’t need support from Terrorist group. and our Economy is better than ur and yah our Cricket team to so SHUT THE FUK UP. and try Cleanin the dirt what u guys have on ur own back yard DUMB FUKSSS.
and yah before any one would point out finger i am sorry For the language i used u guys are so dumb that just boils my Blood all i am trying to say is dont support those idiots whom u call politicians. Guys irst try gettin rid of ur Internal Problems then u guys can Bother about us because everybody knows the amount of foregin Currency u guys have ur Economy Sucks. first try making pakistan a better place atleast a place where u can live a good life and die a natural death. and it is a Famous sayin u reep what u sow u Helped these Terrorist Groups and now u guys are gettin screwed is it our fault i know u guys wont even think twice before blaming us. Except the fact that u guys a responsible for what ever happened Kick all those terrorist group out and how can people help u when u guys dont want to help urself. If u guys are suffering from Disease u have to except the fact that ur really suffering from and and then take the Diagnosise. But the problem here is u guys know what the problem is but u guys still dont want to except it. Except it and only then can any one provide help to u guys Imagine imzmam and few Guys are asking BCCI to help them saving their Cricket. so u guys need our help but what have u guys done to get help u all were pissed just because india dint tour pakistan. our cricket team is scared ETC. and see what happened to Srilanka Cricket team u guys dint even chase the terrorist U guys have Pussy Police. Just take an exaple of Mumbai attack All the terrorist were killed and one arrested thats our Force. Not Pussy like u guys who were scared to even chase them. this shows one thing involment of the Police aswell then how is it possible they couldnt do any thing and the route was changed and the terrorist knew about it u can say that there was a guy in the Hotel with The srilankan team and he was telling the route etc etc But the truth is how is possible to set everything in just 20 min. these Terrorist knew the route and secondly someone in the Police already informed them about the Security and it wa a full proof plan and they escaped.
and yah before any one would point out finger i am sorry For the language i used u guys are so dumb that just boils my Blood all i am trying to say is dont support those idiots whom u call politicians. Guys irst try gettin rid of ur Internal Problems then u guys can Bother about us because everybody knows the amount of foregin Currency u guys have ur Economy Sucks. first try making pakistan a better place atleast a place where u can live a good life and die a natural death. and it is a Famous sayin u reep what u sow u Helped these Terrorist Groups and now u guys are gettin screwed is it our fault i know u guys wont even think twice before blaming us. Except the fact that u guys a responsible for what ever happened Kick all those terrorist group out and how can people help u when u guys dont want to help urself. If u guys are suffering from Disease u have to except the fact that ur really suffering from and and then take the Diagnosise. But the problem here is u guys know what the problem is but u guys still dont want to except it. Except it and only then can any one provide help to u guys Imagine imzmam and few Guys are asking BCCI to help them saving their Cricket. so u guys need our help but what have u guys done to get help u all were pissed just because india dint tour pakistan. our cricket team is scared ETC. and see what happened to Srilanka Cricket team u guys dint even chase the terrorist U guys have Pussy Police. Just take an exaple of Mumbai attack All the terrorist were killed and one arrested thats our Force. Not Pussy like u guys who were scared to even chase them. this shows one thing involment of the Police aswell then how is it possible they couldnt do any thing and the route was changed and the terrorist knew about it u can say that there was a guy in the Hotel with The srilankan team and he was telling the route etc etc But the truth is how is possible to set everything in just 20 min. these Terrorist knew the route and secondly someone in the Police already informed them about the Security and it wa a full proof plan and they escaped.
Foolsparadise and other Hindu Fanatics,
Hindu priest ‘advised father to rape his daughter’
Date: 20 March 2009
India: A Mumbai businessman has been arrested for allegedly raping his daughter for more than eight years, apparently on the advice of a Hindu mystic who said it would make him wealthy.
Authorities also arrested the man’s wife, suspected of being an accomplice, and the mystic, for allegedly raping the man’s other daughter.
http://news.scotsman.com/world/Mystic-39advised-father-to-rape.5092920.jp
What are you guys? You sprinkle cow pee on your food, worship rats and monkeys and here you are acting as The gods of Morals.
You worship the idols that one of you makes, you are masters of ‘cut n paste’ culture.
What is your culture? you are just pimps and whores and because you own tons of whores and have piles of money doesn’t make you higher than any south Asian country be it Srilanka, Nepal or Bhutan and let alone Pakistan.
Here are Indian Moral values:
Man in India marries dog:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21768663/
Indians are all famous for aborting girl babies:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4592890.stm
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/jul/07072309.html
Indians famouse for raping foreign tourists:
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?newsid=1194286
Tourists Beware – India, a Major Rape Destination
http://indiablogs.searchindia.com/2008/12/01/tourists-beware-india-a-major-rape-destination/
Rape rate increase in India:
Since 1971, the incidence of rape in India has increased by a whopping 734%.
Source: http://ncrb.nic.in/cii2007/cii-2007/Snapshots%201953-2007.pdf
Sexual assaults on foreigners threaten Indian tourism:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article3191537.ece
Tourists Beware – India, a Major Rape Destination
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/australia/TN1V3R651BBBRJTB1
bravo sameer!
thanks for the links
wt ever .seriously i did not read all the comments bt i know ccpo lahore pervez rathore.Hes a great man .A hero i’d say.ive been to his home works all night and keep on thinking for some goood ideas to save lahore.non of u have ever seen him i bet and AYESHA should not be saying bad things.u me angrYYYYYYYYYY.
indians do that all and then blame others or pakistani people
wt ever indians i know u guys are shame less people .and u do the attacks and never let anyone know .INDIANS ARE PEOPLE WITH OUT HEARTS.IDOTS
leave Islam!leave worshipping pagan moon god called allahu!
No India or raw has interest in pakistan or afghan.Islamists themselves bombs and accuse poor Indians,Hindus,Jews,Christians as the conspiracy leads.It is hereditary with those who follow islam to lie and live in denial of truth like pakistani media does.
read:
http://thereligionofpeace.com
send prize bond guess by mail
Only God knows that!