A shocking video which is making news across the local media in Pakistan of a women being publicly lashed in the Northern Areas of Pakistan. Her crime being that she was seen publicly with a man who was not her husband. I think merely watching this video makes me cringe at the skewed concept of ‘Sharia’ being enforced in our northern areas, I believe this is not what Islam preaches
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tgq5ymtAfBsI agree with Faisal K when he says “All the women leaders in the assemblies of Pakistan upon seeing this should resign from their posts in protest” This is outrageous even in the light of the five women who were buried alive in Baluchistan. A search on Bloggers.pk shows that Meher Bokhari a show host on Samaa is planing to do a show today at 7pm on this controversial issue of public flogging. Also covered in The Guardian
Comments
211 responses to “Public flogging of a woman in SWAT – is this the Islamic way of handing out justice?”
No worries Teeth! We have our legendary hero Iftikhar Chaudhury as Chief Justice of Pakistan. He will not let them get away with that.
The honourable brave warriors of Islam are showing their true colours again.
They fight like 'geedars' when it comes to our armed forces; but with unarmed women, they will be brave and will flog them in public.
Death is too kind a punishment for these inbred, barbaric cunts.
Fatima what can Justice Chaudhury do any longer? The Writ of Pakistan isn't recognized by this barbaric group. I'm afraid to say, I see no other option other than Military ones.
The problem is not about them (so called Taliban)doing this. The problem is about our govt letting this happen.
This is ridiculous and who the heck said they are Muslims?? ask them I bet they don't know who was Hazrat Muhammad PBUH…yes they dont coz they don't know wht r Hadiths and why a Muslim have to not only believe on them but also act on them…they forced their so called shariyat and Hazrat Muhammad PBUH never ever forced anything to anyone….Hazart Muhammad fought about 80+ wars in his life and he did not forced any of his prisoner for converting into Islam…..these ppl are just a brainless (probably) Israeli agents whose main task is to destroy Islam's image in the world..
Ditto Hassan. I agree. Such people are bringing shame to Islam.
I think the restoration of Iftikhar Chaudhry was a fantastic achievement by the civil society of Pakistan; but I find it shameful that no lawyer has marched against Sufi Muhammad and Maulana (Faz)lullah's expulsion of lawyers and magistrates from Swat.
It doesn't matter what interpretation of what religion is used, religion should not pollute the business of the state.
Hassan
I know a guy whose father is one of top officers in Pak railways. They are from Waziristan. And he was telling me these guys who (call themselves Taliban) started living there a few years ago. They got places to live on hire paying $500 or more which was quite big amount these days. Then they started militant activities which were opposed by local people but by the time, these people were already in power. Now if army is killing them, whats wrong about it?
well well well!
this incidence will provide a perfect opportunity to shed the crocodile tears.
So do you condemn the public flogging of this girl, Dr Jawwad? Or not? Obviously your concern for the people of Swat is genuine, isn't it? What a laugh.
its not islamic.
it should have done behind the closed doors and through lady volunteers.
Oh, so she still SHOULD HAVE BEEN FLOGGED?! Oh right, be barbarian, but do it in pardah! I really shouldn't be surprised you support such medieval practices. Would you allow your sister, mother or daughter to be flogged if she went out to buy bread or pay the electricity bill?
And then you tell us about crocodile tears.
its not islamic. it should have done behind the closed doors and through lady volunteers. [Dr Jawwad Khan]
=======================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
If you talk of Islami Shariah Code then please go and read about Islamic Punishment because Islamic Punishment are administered openly [Durrul Al Behy by Shawkani, Baloogh Al Maram by Hajar Asqalani – both are in Arabic and availabale in English and Urdu as well]. These Hypocrite Mullahs run for cover when under fire. Just imagine after the breaking news on GEO TV when a spokesman of Rampantly Deviant Sufi Muhammad was approached, he while explaining it to the GEO TV [Lady news reader] that conducting and administring publicly is wrong and Un-Islami [please define the public beheading in Saudi Arabia]. These Mullahs particularly the Deobandi Anarchists have no shame whatsoever when it comes to exploiting the Holy Name of Islam.
Good point, what's the fun in being a barbaric medieval animal if you have to whip an innocent girl in private?
Besides, Sufi Muhammad is just the mouthpiece, everyone knows Maulana (Faz)Lullah calls the shot in Swat. And his spokesman Muslim Khan has said "Why not! She [the girl who was flogged] went out in the open without a male companion".
It's unbelievable that in the 21st century, such medieval practices still take place.
@amir mughal!
please always read the post before boasting yourself as all knower.i have already read the sahee bukharee thrice along with all saahe sitta.first time i read the sahee bukharee when i was 13 years old just for curosity.
read again what i wrote.
@danial
niether of my family member is secular.they are all religious people.it means that there is no chance of flogging what so ever.
@amir mughal
yes it should be in public but in order to maintain the dignity of women it is better to execute the punishment behind the close door.
punishment of a women is against the modesty and prudency.
in quran the punishment of fornicator is 100 lashes on skin.
(sura nur – 2) so if you do this in the public you will violate the islamic code of conduct.
in saudia women are not punished publicly.
ulema e deo band did a great job for islam.please do not redicule them on the basis of wrong doing of few illiterate fanatics.
i wonder ehat hajar asqalini wrote about the punishment of a women in public?
would you please tell us about that?
@danial burki!
it is all about perception of the act.
you see this act as a fulfilling of body needs like eating, sleeping etc…
islam see's this act more disgusting, obnoxious and more criminally intensified than the murder.
Therefore a murderer can escape the execution if the relatives forgive him but an adulterer can not.
It is good to hear that the Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhury has established a supreme court bench for its scrutiny. I appreciate that and hope an exemplary outcome for the future.
You mean they didn't kill her for Honor
Did something change here. I thought they kill the woman in the name of honor
I can tell these people are idiots. Look at the people who burried Five (not one) women alive are still honorable and sitting in the parliament
If we look at the history of Christianity and Europe it is these sort of extreme waves of religion which made whole of Europe ,Secular.
—
I saw this many weeks ago but still I have no reaction.No anger ,no pain,no hurt and no humiliation.
This is simply not me,neither my country ,nor my people,neither my culture,nor my religion.
These people cannot be allowed to treat us like animals in the name of religion.
——
We cannot loose Pakistan to these outcasts of Saudi Arabia,Egypt,Somalia and Yemen.
FOr DR Jawwad Khan,
Yes an adulterer deserves to be punished according to the shariah but why do muslim men over look the part that says that when u see it happen the first time look away, if u see it happen again warn them, if u see it happen the 3rd time tell the husband and yet if it still doesnt stop THEN punish her… here, unfortunately without proof of adulteration our MUSLIM men jump to conclusions and for the sole reason of EGO, accuse their women of unlawful acts and force the shariah's LAST RESORT punishments upon them… If following Islamic law is what our society needs to do then it needs to learn to follow all the steps and not take chauvinistic shortcuts.
How come our MEN, who have been proven to have had promiscuous relationship (premarital/ extramarital), examples of which have had seats in our government were only fired but not flogged or stoned or any such thing.. Does the Shariah only apply for the women in our country.
We are not going to buried in the same grave and held responsible for others mistakes.. who r we to judge others, if he/she had erred, God Himself knows how, when and where to punish. We need to stop finding ways to punish others and instead use that energy to improve ourselves and hence improve the wretched state our country is in.
Friends including Dr Jawwad,
This is not sharia rule, it is satanic rule. I challenge one and all to prove otherwise, supporters of the savages in Swat are invited to take me up on the challenge by visiting the links below and commenting:
http://blog.otherpakistan.org/
http://blog.otherpakistan.org/2009/04/03/swat-und…
Feimanallah Swat & Taliban Murdabad
Wasim
dactar jawaad
i tried my level best to find one gud point about your personality but u keep on reinforcing my gut instinct that you are nothing but a shameless illeterate jahil of the highest order.
you use the words lolomycin and a number of other abusive words.you indulge in tohmat by calling people non muslims and accusing their families of being prostitutes.your posts on ghazi criminal blog are full of disgusting crap.you try to use the name os sharia and islam to cover crimes of these misbegotten psychoes by calling them islamic and sharaee.
people like you are infact an insult for muslims.you defend your abusive language .and you are also defending the flogging of an innocent girl whose only crime is being hostage to taliban mullahas in swat.all such people who are supporting the indian/israelis sponsored insurgency in swat/fata should be shot.
dactar jawad please explain why ur beloved jamia hifza brigade roamed around on the streets of isb without mehrams?
i know your typical abusive mentality.you are welcome to your abuses.as somebody said on zardari blog "your post are just full of crap"…how true
@ dr.jawwadkhan
I was simply shocked, aghast, whatever you call it after seeing the video, but your remarks sir are utterly utterly barbaric! They make the Taliban spokesperson Muslim Khan's arguments look tame in comparison! Why the need for all this hypocrisy? Why don't you come out in the open and declare once and for all that yes, you infact support the barbaric creatures known to mankind as 'Taliban'?
I so disgusted by the behavior of Taliban and their supporters that I don't know what's worse: the American forces or the Taliban! I hope they finish each other off!
Oh, and before you declare other people as 'kaafirs' because they don't adhere to 'your' version of Islam, please do Islam and all Muslims a favor and read something about such stuff!
Dr Jawwad,
Lol, dude every body is rough on you. You are swimming against the stream.
I will give you reasons why you are wrong.
1- First of all, the 'victim' is a woman.
2- The people punishing her are 'Taliban'.
Aren't these enough.
If these two things don't make you change, then there is no use for the 3rd or 4th reason.
You are just like a moron, who would insist to know all the details of the case. Aren't these enough reasons?
why all the hype?
If the girl actually did commit the crime then she got the punishment in accordance with Sharia law
This is not barbaric or whatever this is what Quran says, we might not like it but being Muslim have to accept it
Qur'an is noted in Surah 24 (An-Núr), Verse 2:
"The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment."
If she is innocent then obviously that is wrong
@dr J
"its not islamic.
it should have done behind the closed doors and through lady volunteers."
I am no expert but the Verse that I quoted above clearly says that this should be done in open for both man and woman
First i strongly condemn this barbaric act in the name of Islam, the people who are justifying this act as Islamic don't even know about Islam, There should be 4 witnesses for this.
Awab and people working in P.T.I should leave this party as Imran khan is working with talibans and have deep links with the people like Hameed Gul who are actualy giving support to those Talibans.
Moreover PTI members are working with talibans as well and So called Liberals like Awab are still working in PTI.
@ladies and gentlemen!
i am just trying to defend the ALLAH(SWT) divine order that's all. do not ask me, ask yourselves the very question.
are you ready to follow the the order of ALLAH(SWT) or not?
do you think that fornication is as light as a non physical flirtation?
finally do you think that islamic penal code is barbaric?
ask yourselves not me.
i have no sympathy for a male fornicator at all.
@blog!
what i said that islamic code of conduct should not be violated.only ladies can be spectators of this punishment.
for the real punishment you have to reveal her skin.
tell me is it appropriate in the presence of men?
@noman
where is your favourite "Quran and sunnah" chant gone?
munafiq spare no time ridiculing the laws of sharia indirectly.
@Ali
thank you very mush for your "enlightened" guidance
@blog: Thank you for pointing out that it's not just the Taliban that are senseless animals, but their religion actually requires such punishment.
And I'm glad that the 'This is not Islam' crowd actually cringes at the punishments actually prescribed by Islam. Maybe there is hope after all.
And no, Dr Jawwad, it is for this incident and numerous others like it that I absolutely reject the order of your Allah.
@ Danial
I echo your sentiments for Dr Jawwad.
Feimanallah Swat
Wasim
@ Jawwad
I guess this is not Pakistan this is a jungle where any one can make a Shariah Court and start imposing shariah and punishments.
Get a life !!
No body is contradicting the laws of Allah nor anyone can, there should be 4 witnesses who actually see from their own eyes the actual procedure of SEX.
Now from the events and from the details it is not clear that the girls actually did the crime nor Talibans are accepting they have 4 people who actually saw the girl doing SEX with anyone, infact one of the story is she got out from the house with here Father in law so the justice has been done with her, i ask you Father In Law is Mehram or not ??
Only Jamatis are actually supporting all this so thanks for telling all of us your political and theoretical affiliation.
Ditto Khaled
You are a very sensible guy. There is a thing called Ijama as well. Hope these barbarians don't know about it. This act can never be justified and whats the dignity about such a bunch of losers who talk about the dignity of a woman and treat her her this way in front of strangers which are of opposite sex. What about the guys who were holding her? What about the guy who was lashing her. Is this the dignity and Islam these pathans talk about?
Another lame attempt by anti Shariah guys to screw up deal in SWAT
Adnan
We are not Anti Sharia. Does Sharia says to do so in front of so many strangers. Tell me a single point of sanity here. Is it really Islam. I am talking about the facts, not the lame excuses to prove the rightfulness of this stupid incident. Any anti state activity is wrong. This simply is against humanity.
@khaled!
if the same punishment would have been carried out after the testimony of 4 witness, would you then appericiate practicing islamic jurisprudence?
@wasim arif/ other pakistan
"This is not Islam’ crowd actually cringes at the punishments actually prescribed by Islam"
"Dr Jawwad, it is for this incident and numerous others like it that I absolutely reject the order of your Allah"
do you really mean echoing danial's comment?
did you actually read his comments?
do you really know the views of @danial about ALLAH(swt), NABI E KAREEM(saww) and ISLAM?
please do not let this wave of anger against so called crime against women, flush your faith.
well as far as Sharia law and its interpretation is concerned, I think I have read that you require at least four witnesses to prove that they actually saw the act of fornication. And since there were no four witnesses, then we may safely assume that the Taliban have come up with a Sharia of their own.
But such matters aside, since in Pakistan we don't follow Sharia in the rest of the country why is Swat made a scapegoat? Sharia was a set of laws prescribed for a society nearly 1400 years ago, it's not relevant today. That's where 'ijtehad' comes into play. It was for this very reason that 'ijtehad' was prescribed so that such matters could be dealt with.
So please stop making it sound as if the God of Quran is a pervert who is only concerned with the so-called loose behavior in women and is not concerned with the much greater problems threatening people everywhere! Thanks.
its not islamic. it should have done behind the closed doors and through lady volunteers. i wonder ehat hajar asqalini wrote about the punishment of a women in public? would you please tell us about that?@amir mughal: yes it should be in public but in order to maintain the dignity of women it is better to execute the punishment behind the close door. [Dr Jawwad]
===============
Dear Dr Sahab,
Firstly, if you talk of Islam then keep in mind that administring punishment is the authority of Ruler i.e. State [no matter how bad or corrupt he may be, he is to be followed and no Khrooj [Rebellion] is allowed – any such Khurooj [Rebellion] against Ruler would be dealt like Karbala [Ahkamul Quran – Qazi Abu Bakar Ibn Arabi Al Maliki – dont get confused because he is not Sufi Ibn Arabi]
One should have preferred [when he/she doesn't have the knowledge of Shariah] silence instead of declaring that punishing openly is Anti-Islamic [Spokesman of Mullah Sufi Mohammad while talking to GEO TV also declared that it was Unislamic to punish somebody openly – and what a fool and ignorant both of them are]
Your main point is that this punishment should have been behind the closed door, and this position is also taken by Kamran Khan of GEO TV today.
Please get Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim and go through the narrations of a Hudd Sentence [on committing adultery] passed by Prophet Mohammad [PBUH] against two of his Companions [May Allah be pleased with both of them]. One was Ma'aiz Aslami [May Allah be pleased with him] and other was a Lady Companion Ghamdiya [May Allah be pleased with her] were stonned to death publicly.
Had I been an exploiter of Islam like these Mullahs are then I wouldn't have taken refuge by avoiding questions I would have rather owned the act without any fear and would've been a committed Mullah [Thanks Allah – I am an ordinary, mortal, sinner Muslim]
=================
ulema e deo band did a great job for islam.please do not redicule them on the basis of wrong doing of few illiterate fanatics. [Dr Jawwad Khan]
-====
Dear Dr Sahab,
Let me give you a glimpse of Deobandi-Barelvi-Wahabi and Shia Mullahs:
ENJOY:
Eternal Darkness of the Unimaginative MULLAH Mind
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/10/eternal-…
Amazing! Dr Jawwad terms the merciless and barbaric flogging of a 17-year-old girl WITHOUT TRIAL and without any proof that she committed a crime even under Islamic law as a "SO CALLED" crime against women.
Those who think these are 'so called' crimes are 'so called' douchebags.
"Sharia was a set of laws prescribed for a society nearly 1400 years ago, it's not relevant today"
thanks for clearing your position.
islamic laws are made by Allah(swt)like all other things which are created by ALLAH(swt) for example earth,moon, sun,air,water etc etc etc.
if his creation is not became out dated even after millions of years then how His laws can be out dated in just 1400 years?
@amina!
you suppose to be a muslim. how can you say such things?
how long one can live on earth? after that?
dust? end of the story?
is it that simple?
do you believe that humans are just the end result of the ridiculous evaluation?
if you are really a muslim then please think about these issues.
pukhta afkar kahan dhoondnay jaey koee
is zamany ki hawa rakhtee hey har cheez ko kham
madrasa(school)aqal ko aazad to karta hey magar
chorh jata hey khayalat ko be rabt o nizam
murda la deeni afkar se afrang men ishq
aqal e be rabti e afkar se mashriq men ghulam
please always read the post before boasting yourself as all knower.i have already read the sahee bukharee thrice along with all saahe sitta.first time i read the sahee bukharee when i was 13 years old just for curosity. read again what i wrote. [Dr Jawwad Khan]
=====================
Dear Dr Sahab,
I never said that I know all. [Only Allah has that right and knowledge]
I am not saying that you haven't read Sihah-e-Sitta but read it again [Maaz Aslami and Ghamdiya incident] and see for yourself as to what you have written in your very first post
"QUOTE"
its not islamic. it should have done behind the closed doors and through lady volunteers.[Dr Jawwad Khan]
"UNQUOTE"
had you been aware of Bukhari and Muslim, you wouldn't have written that above.
Prophet Mohammad [PBUH] never used lady volunteer for administring Hudd Sentence.
Please get Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim and go through the narrations of a Hudd Sentence [on committing adultery] passed by Prophet Mohammad [PBUH] against two of his Companions [May Allah be pleased with both of them]. One was Ma’aiz Aslami [May Allah be pleased with him] and other was a Lady Companion Ghamdiya [May Allah be pleased with her] were stonned to death publicly.
oh god!
Comment by dr.jawwadkhan on April 3, 2009 @ 9:44 pm
"what i said that islamic code of conduct should not be violated.only ladies can be spectators of this punishment.
for the real punishment you have to reveal her skin.
tell me is it appropriate in the presence of men?
while stoning can be done with out violating the islamic code in the presence of general public
pukhta afkar kahan dhoondnay jaey koee, is zamany ki hawa rakhtee hey har cheez ko kham, madrasa(school)aqal ko aazad to karta hey magar, chorh jata hey khayalat ko be rabt o nizam, murda la deeni afkar se afrang men ishq, aqal e be rabti e afkar se mashriq men ghulam [Dr Jawwad Khan]
===
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
Since you are very fond of Islam also of poetry so lets see how the ultimate source of Islam i.e. Quran views Poetry and Poets and please include Poet Iqbal in this category as well as mentioned in Quran:
"Shall I inform you upon whom the devils descend? They descend on every sinful, false one. They listen eagerly, but most of them are liars.As for poets, the erring follow them. Hast thou not seen how they stray in every valley, And how they say that which they do not? "[Verse 221-222-223- 224-225-226 Chapter 026 AL-SHUARA (THE POETS)]
And We have not taught him (Muhammad) poetry, nor is it meet for him. This is naught else than a Reminder and a Lecture making plain, To warn whosoever liveth, and that the word may be fulfilled against the disbelievers. [Chapter 36 Verses 69-70 YA-SEEN (YA-SEEN)]
That it is indeed the speech of an illustrious messenger. It is not poet's speech – little is it that ye believe! Nor diviner's speech – little is it that ye remember! It is a revelation from the Lord of the Worlds. [Chapter 69 Verse 40-41-42-43 AL-HAAQQA (THE REALITY)]
Narrated Ibn ‘Umar:
The Prophet said, "It is better for a man to fill the inside of his body with pus than to fill it with poetry." [Muslim]
I wish as it was done for Israel, other such people like Dr. Jawwad Khan (Yes comparison is intentional) should be given a Country of their own, with no external trade, communication etc. allowed with civilized world that we want to live in. BTW Dr. khan, this Internet you are using was not created by Allah(SWT) but by an American and that too as defense project and Yahoo Messenger/GTalk you may be using is based on works of a Zionist Israeli. As a true muslim who follows the real Islam, not like us mere mortals, please never ever use Internet again.
what i said that islamic code of conduct should not be violated. [Dr Jawwad Khan]
================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
Rogue Mullahs in NWFP have so thoroughly violated the below mentioned Islamic Conduct i.e. Open Khurooj and Takfeer of Muslims on the basis of Sinful Ruler [you cannot declare anyone Kaafir on the basis of sins because such was the practice of Khawarijs]
The crime of hiraba is based on the following Quranic verse:
The punishment for those who wage war [yuharibuna] against God and His Prophet, and perpetrate disorders in the land is: kill or crucify them, or have a hand on one side and a foot on the other cut off or banish them from the land (Quran 5:33).
Hands and legs to be cut off and their eyes to be branded with heated iron pieces and they were thrown at Al-Harra, and when they asked for water to drink, they were not given water. (Bukhari)
Hiraba is another hadd crime defined in the Quran. It is variously translated as "forcible taking," "highway robbery," "terrorism," or "waging war against the state."
Islamic legal scholars have interpreted this crime to be any type of forcible assault upon the people involving some sort of taking of property.It differs from ordinary theft in that the Quranic crime of theft (sariqa) is a taking by stealth whereas hiraba is a taking by force . (Thus, the popular translation as "armed robbery.") Although it is generally assumed to be violent public harassment, many scholars have held that it is not limited to acts committed in public places.
It is in the discussions of the crime of hiraba where the crime of rape appears. A brief review of the traditional descriptions of hiraba reveals that rape is specifically included among its various forms. For example, in Fiqh-us-Sunnah, a modern summary of the primary traditional schools of thought on Islamic law, hiraba is described as: a single person or group of people causing public disruption, killing, forcibly taking property or money, attacking or raping women ("hatk al arad"), killing cattle, or disrupting agriculture. Reports of individual scholars on the subject further confirm the hiraba classification of rape. Al-Dasuqi, for example, a Maliki jurist, held that if a person forced a woman to have sex, their actions would be deemed as committing hiraba. In addition, the Maliki judge Ibn Arabi, relates a story in which a group was attacked and a woman in their party raped. Responding to the argument that the crime did not constitute hiraba because no money was taken and no weapons used, Ibn Arabi replied indignantly that "hiraba with the private parts" is much worse than a hiraba involving the taking of money, and that anyone would rather be subjected to the latter than the former. The famous Spanish Muslim jurist, Ibn Hazm, a follower of the Zahiri school, reportedly had the widest definition of hiraba, defining a hiraba offender as: [O]ne who puts people in fear on the road, whether or not with a weapon, at night or day, in urban areas or in open spaces, in the palace of a caliph or a mosque, with or without accomplices, in the desert or in the village, in a large or small city, with one or more people . . . making people fear that they'll be killed, or have money taken, or be raped ("hatk al arad") . . . whether the attackers are one or many "
@amina
"well as far as Sharia law and its interpretation is concerned, I think I have read that you require at least four witnesses to prove that they actually saw the act of fornication. And since there were no four witnesses,"
do we know any background ?
do we know any facts ?
who proved that there were no four witnesses, may be there one? did anyone confirm ?
don't claim things just on assumptions
oh god!
Comment by dr.jawwadkhan on April 3, 2009 @ 9:44 pm
========================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
You are very fond of Islami Shariah but in Shariah there is no entity named "GOD" which you have called. We call Allah not God
I am deeply pleased that this barbarity in the name of Islam is not acceptable to Pakistanis and for once Pakistan Media ,government and people have condemned it openly.
We must not be harrased and blackmailed in the name of Islam.
Islam does not belong to Moulvis and scholars alone.It belongs to everyone,whoever says he is a Muslim.
Muslims of Pakistan do not need preaching of Islam .We do not need these Madrissahs .
finally people of Pakistan cannot put it under the carpet saying we do not care.
We do care.It is our lives.
I must congratulate all people for contesting these so called ……
Personally I believe they are lost cases and no dialogue is possible with them.
Pakistan army must take a strong stand against them.This is not Islam and this is not face of Pakistan.Since this film was shown at channel 4 few weeks ago I was ashamed of myself.
How can they claim Islam is a religion of equality and Justice when they consider women a sin in herself.
This is the biggest challenge to Muslims all over the world.
Challenge of faith.
This war is not from outside we must not accept it is India,it is USA or it is XYZ.
It is these extremists who are the major cause of Pakistan's undoing.
These people must dealt iron handedly now.