The Peoples Resistance invites you to. “The Blasphemy Law: An Objective Assessment from Religious, Legal & Social Perspectives”
Date: Saturday 24th October, 2009
Time: 5:30 PM
Location: PMA House, Karachi
Some Speakers include:
Dr. Khalid Zaheer,
Advocate Zain Sheikh
Other notable Human Rights Experts and Minority Group Representatives will speak and attend the Seminar.
Chaired and Moderated by Retd Justice Mr. Rana Bhagwandas.
The Peoples’ Resistance (PR) is a civil society group that advocates and supports the Rule of Law and Constitutionalism in our homeland. We, at the PR, are deeply perturbed by the recent blasphemy related incidents in Gojra and other places where many innocent people were subjected to shameless violence and destruction and would like to sponsor an open and objective dialogue aimed at understanding the Blasphemy Law and its implications for our society. In this context, we are organizing a seminar on Saturday, October 24, 2009, at the PMA House, Karachi at 5:30pm under the title of:
Comments
149 responses to “The Blasphemy Law: An Objective Assessment from Religious, Legal & Social Perspectives”
i am compiling all the evidence from Quran and sunnah against his efforts to deviate the muslim ummah from true islam. the true islam [Dr Jawwad Khan]
=========================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
Which True Islam?
Ibn Qayyam [Ahle-Hadith Scholar – and read your comment about Wahabis above] in his I'laam ul Muwaqqi'een 'an Rabb il 'Aalameen Ibn Qayyam [translated by Muhammad Sahab Junagadhi (also a Wahabi and whose Tafsir in Urdu is presented to every Haji by Saudi Arbia) in India, preface was written by Abul Kalam Azad] exposed Hanafi Fiqh's Anti Quran and Anti Hadith Fatwa.
There is a book by Hanafi Scholars namely Kitabul Heel [Book of excuses] wherein these Rampant Fatwa Mongering Hanafi Scholars issued 250 Fatwa [Religious edicts] which has made Unlawful [Haraam] into Lawful [Halal]. In one of the Fatwa from Qazi Abu Yusuf had advised to an Abbasi Caliph that he can sexually use the slave woman freed by Caliph's Father [as per Quran and Hadith this is Haraam].
Crow [Kawwa in Urdu – Ghurab is Arabic] is clearly declared Haram in Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah]
But Hanafi Fiqh books Fatawa Alamgiri [Egyptian Edition], Mabsoot, Ainal Sharah Hidaya, Kitabul Behrar Riqaiq Sharah Kunzul Daqaiq decalres that eating Crow is Halal [Lawful]
Another absurdity rather Blasphmey attributed towrds Hanafi Fiqh, their Hanafi Fiqh books and Hanafi Scholars that writing Quranic Verse with blood and urine [for recovery from Illness] is allowed. Reference is attributed Fourth Hijri's Hanafi Scholar Abu Bakar Mohammad Bin Ahmed Skaf, Fatawa Qazi Khan Chapter Bab Al Hazar Wal Ibahat, Kitabul Behrar Riqaiq Sharah Kunzul Daqaiq bab Tanzih Al Bair Bu Qooh, Fatawa Sirajiya Bab Al Tadawi, Hamawi Sharah Al Ashba Walnazair Bab Al quaeeda Al Khamisa Al Zarar La Yazal, Raddal Mukhtar Sharah Darr Al Mukhtar aka Fatawa Shami Bab Al Tadawi Bil Mehram.
And one such absurdities of Hanafi Fiqh is that you can offer Salat while carrying puppy [clear violation of Quran and Hadith].
What I have learned through different sources that these Deobandis and Barelvis and Mawdudi, Ghamidi and Jamat-e-Islami too are basically the same with minor differences they both allegedly follow the Fiqh [Attributed to Imam Abu Haneefah] Hanafi and his followers and books these Mullah include JI Mullah as well, quotes of which are as under:
Radd al-Muhtar ala ad-Dur al-Mukhtar is a book on Islam by 19th century Hanafi Scholar Ibn Abidin. A commentary on Imam al-Haskafi's Durr al-Mukhtar, it is commonly known as Radd al-Muhtar. It is said to be a compilation of the great Fatwas of Imam Abu Hanifa [May Allah have mercy on his soul], and Hidayah is the name of a famous Hanafi juridical work by Burhan-ud-din Ali bin Abi Bakr al-Marghinani (1152-1197) which is considered widely authoritative as a guide to Fiqh amongst Muslims in Central Asia, Afghanistan and India, and is the basis for much of the Anglo-Islamic law in India and Pakistan.
Now read the excerpts from these two Books through which this Mullah Calamity in Pakistan want to Implement Islamic Law.
"QUOTE"
1 – Be the curse of Allah be on those who reject Imam Abu Hanifa (Muqadimah dar Mukhtar)
2 – When The Prophet Issa [Jesus – PBUH] will come back he will follow the Madhab [Fiqh] of Abu Hanifa (Muqadimah dar Mukhtar)
3 – Khidr spent 30 years to learn knowledge from Abu Hanifa, then Qushayri learnt from Khidr during 3 years and he wrote more than 1000 books and put them in a box in the sea. When Isa aley salam will take these books and act upon them. (Muqadimah dar Mukhtar)
3 – Is someone pays a woman to do zina [adultery] , there is no hadd [no punishment] ( Dar Mukhtar, kitab Hudud, fatawa khaniyah misr vol 3 p 508, kanz daqaiq ed deoband p 180, and this fatwa is attributed to Imam Abu Hanifa while his two students say there is hadd [Adultery Law]. It is well known that the hanafi books of fiqh there is no Chain of Narration [isnad] to their Imam)
4 – The salary of the prostitute is halal [lawful] (Chalpi shara Wiqayah)
5 – If he pays a woman to do zina or wati [Adultery or Intercourse] or if he says I will give you so much dirham or she says give me so much, there is no had [no punishment under Adultery Law] (Alamgiri, vol 2 p 168)
6 – If someone does jima [intercourse] with an animal or with a dead or a young girl and there is no inzal [ejaculation] , then ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah, masail ghusl, aussi Alamgiri, Kitab taharah)
7 – If someone does sodomy with a woman who fasts or a man who fasts, their fast is not broken (Hidayah, Kitab Sawm)
8 – If a young boy of 10 does Jima [intercourse] with a balighah [adult] Woman, there is no Ghusl [bathe]( Alamgiri Kitab taharah)
9 – If someone enters his penis in his dubur (anus), then ghusl is not obligatory (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah Masail Ghusl)
10 – If a man in his dubur [anus] or a woman in her vagina enters the penis of the dead, or his finger, or wood, there is no ghusl [bathe] (Hidayah Kitab Taharah)
11 – If someone enters the penis of an animal in her vagina or dubur [anus], the ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab Taharah Masail Ghusl)
12 – If someone enters the penis of a boy without desire in her vagina or dubur [anus], the ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah Masail Ghusl)
13 – After doing Jima [Intercourse] with a young girl, it is not necessary to clean his penis (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah Masail Ghusl)
14 – If someone does jima [intercourse] with a virgin and the maidenhead is not broken, ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah Masail Ghusl)
15 – If someone does wati [intercourse] in the dubur [have anal sex or commit bestiality] of an animal or in his anus and there is no inzal, then Ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Hidayah kitab taharah)
16 – If the balighah woman [adult woman] does wati [intercourse] with a young boy or with a crazy, then the woman has no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
17 – If someone does wati [intercourse] with a non balighah woman [non adult woman], or with a dead or an animal, there is no hadd [punishment] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
18 – If someone does zina [adultery] with the salve of his child or great child, there is no hadd (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
19 – If someone does zina [adultery] with the slave of grand father or grand mother, there is no Hadd [Punishment for Adultery](Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
20 – If someone has a slave in rahn (security for loan) and he does zina [adultery], there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
21 – If someone does nikah [Marriage] with a mahram [sister, mother or daughter or real blood aunt] for ever woman and consider it halal [lawful], there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
22 – The woman that are for ever forbidden, and he does nikah and he even if he considers that haram [Unlawful] , there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud, et Alamgiri who attribute that to Imam Abu Hanifa)
23 – If he does nikah [marriage] with a woman and joins in nikah his wife’s sister or mother, there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Alamgiri)
24 – If he does temporary marriage [Muta'ah] and he considers that haram [Unlawful], there is no hadd [[Punishment for Adultery] (Alamgiri)
25 – If someone does nikah with a woman who is married before, and he knows she has a husband and it is haram [Unlawful] , there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] Fatawa Khaniya misr vol 3 p 508)
26 – There is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] of zina [Adultery] for the one who cannot speak, neither any hadd [Punishment for Adultery] for something else, even if the witness are present and he admits with isharah [gesture] or by writing (Alamgiri misr, vol 2 p 168)
27 – If someone kidnaps a slave, does zina [Adultery] and pay his responsible [Owner] for her price, there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
28 – If someone gives permission to another to do zina [Intercourse] with his slave, there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Alamgiri vol 2 p 169)
29 – If the Khalifah or the imam or the king does zina [ADULTERY] there is no hadd [PUNISHMENT] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud) [also in Hidaya and that Hidaya is being taught in Pakistani Madressah]
30 – There is no hadd for sodomy [Anal Intercourse] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
31 – If someone does zina [ADULTERY] in dar ul harb [Land/Country of Infidels] or in the land of revolted people, there is no hadd [PUNISHMENT] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
32 – The muslim can take riba [Interest] from a Infidel, in dar ul harb [Land/Country of Infidels] (Dar Mukhtar vol 4 p 209)
33 – This is also true for the one who becomes muslim and does not do Hijrah, whe can take riba from him( Dar Mukhtar vol 4 p 210)
34 – If someone prays holding a dog in his hands, his prayer is not fasid [INVALID] (Dar Mukhtar misr vol 1 p 153)
35 – If someone in prayer watches the private part of a woman, his prayer [Salat] is not broken [means it will remain valid] ( Maraqi Al falah misr vol 1 p 200)
36 – If someone watches at book of fiqh during prayer, is prayer is not broken. ( Alamgiri vol,1 p 106)
37 – If someone prays and holds the Quran and reads from it, is prayer is fasid [Invalid] (Dar Mukhtar vol 1 p 641)
38 – If in the conditions of Imam in the first cases there is equality, then The one whose wife is more beautiful ( Dar Mukhtar vol 1 p 412)
39 – Then the one who has the biggest head and the shortest member [Penis] (Dar Mukhtar vol 1 p 412)
40 – The meaning of member is penis (Rad Mukhtar Sharh Dar Mukhar, p 413)
41 – The one who does watch the vagina of a woman in a miror or in water, then the mother of this woman is forbidden to him (Dur Mukhtar, Kitab Nikah, fasl fil Muharamat)
"UNQUOTE"
i am compiling all the evidence from Quran and sunnah against his efforts to deviate the muslim ummah from true islam. the true islam [Dr Jawwad Khan]
# mark my word ….these guys if not atopped and exposed will change the muslim society in just few years. [Dr Jawwad Khan]
=============================
Dear Jawwad Sahab
Which kind of true Islam and where is the so-called Ummah? Those Mullahs who issue Fatwa against and write books against Ghamidi and Khalid Zaheer should take a deep look into their own history that they been issuing Fatwa of Disbeilef against each other throughout History. This Fatwa Mongering against each other has created confusion amongst the Ordinary Muslim as to who and which interpretation of Islam is to be followed. Read the Fatwas of Deobandi against Barelvis, Barelvis against Mawdudi, Deobandis, Shias, and Wahabis, Deobandis against Shias, Barelvis, Mawdudi and Wahabis, and Wahabis against all of them.
Read the Fatwas in the following blogs with References.
Here lies the so-called Muslim Ummah! – 1
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/11/here-lie…
Here lies the so-called Muslim Ummah! – 2
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/11/here-lie…
Here lies the so-called Muslim Ummah! – 3
"Fatwa of three hundred Ulama against Deobandis
READ AND LAMENT
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/11/here-lie…
like qadiyanis he is trying to convince the audiance that prophet jesus was dead and ascension was not physical ascension and second descent of prophet jesus(pbuh) [Dr Jawwad Khan]
=======================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
Please include Alleged Poet Sir Allama Mohammad Iqbal in the list of those who denied the second coming Prophet Jesus [Peace Be Upon him]
In the words of Iqbal
"QUOTE"
“You O Preacher, have placed God on top of the heavens
What kind of God is He that shies away from his servants?”
“He whose self wakes up recognizing the human potential
He is the Mahdi and the promise one of the latter times”
“Look at God appearing on the minaret of your heart
And stop waiting for the advent of Mahdi and Jesus”
i. He wrote in a poem:
"Is the son of Mary dead, or does he live?
Are Divine attributes separate from God, or one with His Person?
Is the Coming one the Nazarene Jesus, or a Mujaddid having the son of Mary’s qualities?
Are the Divine words created, or pre-existing from eternity, In which belief does lie the salvation of the Ummah?
Are not sufficient for the Muslims today, These Lat and Manat [idols] carved out by theology."
(Armaghan Hijaz, p. 227)
ii. "I can only tell you what I believe. I consider the Hadith reports about the Mahdi, the coming Messiah, and mujaddidiyya, to be derived from Persian and non-Arab conceptions. They have no connection with Arab concepts or the true spirit of the Quran."
(Iqbal Nama, ‘Collection of the Letters of Iqbal’, vol. ii, letter to Chaudhary Muhammad Ahsan, p. 231)
iii. "Look for the descent of God upon the minaret of your own heart,
And give up waiting even for the Mahdi or Jesus."
(Baqiyat Iqbal, p. 451).
iv. "As far as I understand the meaning of this movement, the Ahmadis believe that Jesus died the death of a mortal human being, and the return of the Messiah refers to a person who bears spiritual similarity to him. This belief gives this movement a rational appearance."
(Khutbat Madras; also, Newspaper Mujahid, 13 February 1935; and Allama Iqbal ka paigham millat-i-Islamiyya kai nam, p. 22)
v. It is written about him:
"Jamal-ud-Din Afghani, Allama Iqbal, and many other thinkers believe that no Mahdi or Messiah will now descend from heaven."
(Zamindar, Lahore, 27 July 1952)
Also include Maulana Abul Kalam Azad [a Salafi/Wahabi/Ahle-Hadith] Politican of Alla India Congress into the list of those who deny the second coming of Jesus [PBUH].
i. Upon receiving a letter which read:
"Dear Maulana: … these Mirza’i [i.e., Ahmadi] people ascribe various views to you, and even give references from Wakil, Tazkira, etc., that you believe in Jesus’ death, and that you praised Mirza (Ghulam Ahmad) Sahib. Please write a conclusive book so that they dare not speak again. You should also state therein that it abrogates all your previous writings and views, thus leaving no scope for anyone to bring up old matters. — Inam-Ullah Khan, Baluchistan"
The Maulana replied:
"1. The death of Jesus is mentioned in the Quran itself.
"2. The question of praising or criticising the Mirza Sahib does not arise because:
‘If you are bad, you cannot be good,
He himself is bad who considers you to be bad’."
(Malfuzat-i Azad, compiled by Muhammad Ajmal Khan, Maktaba Mahaul, Karachi, pp. 129, 130)
ii. "The belief (in Jesus being alive) by its nature is in every way a Christian doctrine which has appeared in an Islamic guise."
(Naqsh Azad, p. 102, compiled by Maulana Ghulam Rasul Mahr)
Sayyid Sulaiman Nadawi [Deobandi Hanafi] Iwrote:
i. "Looking at the birth of Jesus, his death and the doctrine of Trinity, some American critics and rationalists now believe that Jesus was just a mythical figure."
(Khutbat Madras, p. 42, Sermon No. 2, published by the Lahore Academy, 205 Circular Road, Lahore)
ii. "It appears from this that even before Sir Syed [Ahmad Khan] some Ulama held the same viewpoint as his on this question [of Jesus’ death]. People today who make this issue a standard for determining belief or disbelief in Islam are indulging in extremism."
(Mu‘araf, March 1930, p. 171)
iii. In a letter from a high ranking Pakistan Government official, published by Maulana Abdul Majid Daryabadi in his newspaper Sidq-i-Jadid of Lucknow (India), the following is recorded about Maulana Sayyid Sulaiman Nadwi’s view of the "descent" of Jesus:
"The Maulana said: ‘I do not hold this belief myself and consider the hadith reports about it to be unsound.’ The Maulana had disclosed this view of his to Maulana Ihtasham-ul-Haq, but had added that since to oppose this belief gives rise to much trouble, he refrained from expressing it, and also because this belief did not relate to the fundamentals of Islam."
(Sidq-i Jadid, Lucknow, 28 October 1955)
Maulana Zafar Ali Khan [Pakistan Movement] , editor of newspaper Zamindar, wrote:
i. "If the moral and spiritual teaching left behind with the Israelites by Jesus after his death (wasal) is examined, it appears that only such people could benefit from this inheritance as live in cloisters and monasteries, leading the lives of hermits."
(Punjab Review, compiled by Maulana Zafar Ali Khan, vol. i, no. 1, 8 August 1901)
ii. Disclosing Maulana Zafar Ali Khan’s view on the issue of Jesus’ death, Maulvi Abdur-Rahman, the Khateeb of the Jami‘ Mosque, Wazirabad, writes:
"On around 25th August, taking with me Maulana Sayyid Inayat-ullah Shah, the Khateeb of Jami‘ Mosque Gujrat, I went to visit Maulana Zafar Ali Khan at Karamabad. Also present there were Mr. Salik the editor of Inqalab and Maulana Chiragh Hasan Hasrat the editor of the daily Ihsan. During the conversation, the mention of Mr. Inayat-ullah Mashriqi came up. Maulana Zafar Ali Khan greatly praised Mr. Mashriqi’s sincerity of heart. In answer to this, I told the Maulana that Mr. Mashriqi’s beliefs ran counter to Islamic teachings. For instance, in his Tazkira he has denied that Jesus is still alive. The Maulana replied:
‘Belief in Jesus being still alive is not an Islamic belief. Many Muslims have rejected it.’
He was supported in strong words by Maulana Charagh Hasan Hasrat. Hearing this denial of Jesus being alive from Maulana Zafar Ali Khan’s tongue pained me beyond words. I said to myself: My God! this is the same Maulana Zafar Ali Khan who has been a leading opponent of the Ahmadis for forty years, and yet his own belief is exactly the same as that of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad." (Newspaper Mujahid, 12 September, 1935).
"UNQUOTE"
we still live in ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN. islam and its ideology is in its genesis its past and most probably in future. [Dr Jawwad Khan]
======================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
No matter what Ghamidi or Khalid say, I have a firm belief on the second Coming of not only Jesus [PBUH] and I also have firm belief on the arrival of Mahdi [but which Mahdi ? Sunni Mahdi or Shia Mahdi].
I agree with you that denying Authentic Hadith is deviancy and since you talk about Islamic Ideology/Identity for Pakistan then please justify in the light of Quran and Sunnah the existence of Milad Sharif [Celebrating Prophet Mohammad – PBUH's birthday], Celebration at Shrines of Alleged Saints of Allah, and last but not the least Moharram Celebrations. If these are wrong then please justify the Alliance of Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal [Alliance of Political Maulvis of Shia, Sunni, Barlevi, Wahabi and Jamat Islami School of thought]
@Amir Mughal!
kindly do not be offended by my posts against javed ghamidi.
this matter is serious and i feel sad when i see most of my fellow citizen have no idea what i am talking about.
rest assure its not about you and me or our difference of opinions.
@dr.awab alvi!
some time i feel sorry for the teethmaestro.many of the threads were spoiled because of my attitude of polemicising.but this time i can't help it.
kindly try to understand the agenda of guys like javed ghamidi and dr.khalid zaheer. i wish if PR could keep itself away from these guys.
its just a wish nothing more.
1. Any form of Had (Prescribed Punishment),
2. Hadith to be direct
3. Nazool Eesa Alahi Salam and his Life (like Qadiyanis)
4. Had for an Apostate (Murtad)
5. Claims the 7 recitations of quran to be wrong (he is a close ally and aide of Daniel Pipes and Robert Spencer)
6. Music and Dancing of all sorts is permissible
7. Jihad against oppression is the only jihad allowed
8. The Shahadat of a man and woman are equal
9. There is no concept of Purdah (Hijab / Veil) in Islam”
_____________________________________________________
just look at the agenda.any one can easily recognize,whose agenda is this….and these guys have full support of pakistani establishment(most probably american establishment too),pakistani electronic media and all the promotion , support and fascilities.
it seems like a most powerful and destructive bomb is ready to be detonated.
@djk
@A.Mughal
An interesting discussion was going on between the two but without, as usual in such subjective issues, any end in sight.
You have quoted a lot from the plethora of islamic literature but did not make the reader any wiser about the basis of the Law of Blasphemy in Islam, the topic of this discussion.
Will either of you please do it now before we get bored and close the blog?
You have quoted a lot from the plethora of islamic literature but did not make the reader any wiser about the basis of the Law of Blasphemy in Islam, the topic of this discussion.
Will either of you please do it now before we get bored and close the blog? [Readinglord]
==================================
Dear Sir,
I have a firm belief in Islamic Punishment but problem with activist type of Muslim is this that they think that Islam exist in punishment whereas punishments are just a minor part of Islam to maintain order in society. Mullahs’ are possessed by the Genie of Piety – Yaani in Maulviyon par Taqway ka Bhoot Sawar Hai. Similarly veil and beard etc.etc in Islam but Islami is not just the name of Punishments, Beards, Veil, and Mullahs having Bad Breath but a way of life which in my humble opinion can only be spread in society gradually and systematically to create an environment for a healthy, clean and pious society. This cannot be achieved by those [Jihadis, Talibans, Afghan Warlords and Saudi and Irani Mutawwas] who had been Foot Soldiers for the US CIA during several of their Campaigns. Saudi Mullahs used in Iran Iraq War for issuing Fatwa against Iran, Irani Ayatullahs were part and parcel of Iran Contra Scandal, Pakistani Mullahs [Mawdudi] included since 1965 till even now are part and parcel of establishment, list goes on and on…
@Aamir Mughal
Thank you for your detailed reply, dear Aamir, but excuse me it does not contain answer to my query as to what is the basis of the Law of Blasphemy in Quran and Sunna, etc..
As I could gather it is an Hadees of Sunnan Abudawud which according to some people provides ample justifcation for lynching the one accused of blasphemy. Here I reprouce a blog (slightly amended) on the subject from 'chowk.com':
"The problem today is that the Islamic religion which was based originally on purely oral communication meant specifically for an illiterate nation (Ummi Arabs) has spread all over the world with heaps of literature created during the period
spread over centuries past. Naturally some contradictions crept in especially between the Quran and Hadees, which have become all the more conspicuous with the advent of Internet, which has virtually reduced the world to a global village.
For instance, the Quran says about the prophet:
“And We have sent you (O Muhammad) not but as a mercy for the ‘Alamin (mankind, jinn and all that exists).”
(The Holy Qur’an, Surah al-Anbiyaa. – (The Prophets) 21:107)
But a Hadees relates:
"Sunnan Abu-Dawud
Book 38, Number 4348:
Narrated Abdullah Ibn Abbas:
A blind man had a slave-mother (A slave-woman bearing children but not treated as a wife?) who used to abuse the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and disparage him. He forbade her but she did not stop. He rebuked her but she did not give up her habit. One night she began to slander the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and abuse him. So he took a dagger, placed it on her belly, pressed it, and killed her. A child who came between her legs was smeared with the blood that was there. When the morning came, the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) was informed about it.
He assembled the people and said: I adjure by Allah the man who has done this action and I adjure him by my right to him that he should stand up. Jumping over the necks of the people and trembling the man stood up.
He sat before the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and said: Apostle of Allah! I am her master; she used to abuse you and disparage you. I forbade her, but she did not stop, and I rebuked her, but she did not abandon her habit. I have two sons like pearls from her, and she was my companion. Last night she began to abuse and disparage you. So I took a dagger, put it on her belly and pressed it till I killed her.
Thereupon the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Oh be witness, no retaliation is payable for her blood."
As regards blasphemy, the main topic of the Hadees, I wonder how can one reconcile the image of the prophet presented in Quran with the one presented in the said Hadees. Technically the Quran should prevail, but no one dares to say this as the compilation of Sunnan Abudawud, which belongs to Suha Sitta, (the six authentic compilations of Ahadees?) can also be described as the Quran ‘Gher matlu’ (Non-reciteable in prayer?). Instead they have got enacted a law of blasphemy based most probably on the above hadees which stipulates the punishment of death for blasphemy when the Hadees actually can be interpreted to give any body (even a blind one) to act as a judge, jury and executioner, all in one, at the same time. And this is what is actually being practiced in the Pakland wherein peoples some times get their personal enmities avenged by a false accusation of blasphemy against their enemies, which being a subjective and undefined concept can lend to any interpretation. In any case, there is no scope either in Quran or Hadees for the accuser to assume himself a judge and that too of the level of the prophet and also act as an executioner or condone any execution.
This is a phenomenon which defies comprehension. We can only pray,” May God save Islam, the religion of peace, from those Mullahs whose Deen is nothing but ’Deen-e-Fassaad'".
it does not contain answer to my query as to what is the basis of the Law of Blasphemy in Quran and Sunna, etc. [readinglord]
=====================
Dear Sir,
This punishment stated by you above is often quoted by the Orientalists to target Prophet Mohammad [PBUH] and Islam and another incidents which are often quoted by them eviction/killing of Jews from Medina, and Forced Conversion in Persian Conquest by Prophet Mohammad [PBUH]'s Companions [May Allah be pleased with everyone of them]
Clarification as per my poor and humble knowledge is as under:
Medina was Islamic State established by Prophet Mohammad [PBUH] and for Blasphemy in Islamic State is Death.
Massacre of Jews in Medina [I am thankful to Mr Ghamidi's student for the post below]
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/11/eviction…
Clarification regarding Forced Conversion Persia:
Some of the important facts that need to be kept in mind while passing any judgments about the expidition of Persia (often termed forced conversion) [by the Companions] and killing and expelling the Jews of the Banu Qurayzah and other tribes from Arabia:
The Prophet Mohammad [PBUH] was the last messenger of Allah. With his status as a Rasul, the Prophet Mohammad [PBUH] was in a position to do Itmamu'l-Hujjah [Final Argument] even as an individual. No one after him has that privilege. No individual can do Itmamu'l-Hujjah now because no individual can claim that his propagation has manifested the truth to the extent that no excuse is left to deny it. Indeed, an individual cannot even be absolutely certain of having understood the truth absolutely correctly. He can only be certain that God will reward him for doing his duty as he has 'been given the light to see it'. Only the Prophet Mohammad [PBUH]'s word are final in religion. After the Prophet [PBUH], the responsibility of bearing witness to the truth of Islam was passed on to his Companions [May Allah be pleased with them], who were declared Ummah Wasat (the intermediate people) and the shuhada 'ala'l-Nas (witnesses over people).
The Qur'an says:
وَجَاهِدُوا فِي اللَّهِ حَقَّ جِهَادِهِ هُوَ اجْتَبَاكُمْ وَمَا جَعَلَ عَلَيْكُمْ فِي الدِّينِ مِنْ حَرَجٍ مِّلَّةَ أَبِيكُمْ إِبْرَاهِيمَ هُوَ سَمَّاكُمُ الْمُسْلِمينَ مِن قَبْلُ وَفِي هَذَا لِيَكُونَ الرَّسُولُ شَهِيدًا عَلَيْكُمْ وَتَكُونُوا شُهَدَاءَ عَلَى النَّاسِ فَأَقِيمُوا الصَّلَاةَ وَآتُوا الزَّكَاةَ وَاعْتَصِمُوا بِاللَّهِ هُوَ مَوْلَاكُمْ فَنِعْمَ الْمَوْلَى وَنِعْمَ النَّصِيرُ
And strive for Allah with the endeavour which is His right. He hath chosen you and hath not laid upon you in religion any hardship; the faith of your father Abraham (is yours). He hath named you Muslims of old time and in this (Scripture), that the messenger may be a witness against you, and that ye may be witnesses against mankind. So establish worship, pay the poor-due, and hold fast to Allah. He is your Protecting friend. A blessed Patron and a blessed Helper! [AL-HAJJ (THE PILGRIMAGE) Chapter 22 – Verse 78]
وَكَذَلِكَ جَعَلْنَاكُمْ أُمَّةً وَسَطًا لِّتَكُونُواْ شُهَدَاءَ عَلَى النَّاسِ وَيَكُونَ الرَّسُولُ عَلَيْكُمْ شَهِيدًا
English Translation:
Thus We have appointed you a middle nation, that ye may be witnesses against mankind, and that the messenger may be a witness against you. [AL-BAQARA (THE COW) Chapter 2 Verse 143]
How can one comment on historical events occurring centuries ago which cannot be verified to day. Even on the face of it the treatment meted out to the vanquished and the prisnors of war in those times was horrible. The Jews were killed with the sword of Moses and not very long afterwords Yazid enacted the carnage at Karbala claiming that he had only used the sword of his 'Naana' (grand-father) against Hussain whom he had got declared by 'darbaari' mullah as out of the ford of Islam and thus deserving to be lynched.
But what about Mongols of whose progeny you claim to be. I belong to a traditionally Sunni Sayed family but unluckily I got married with a real mongol woman with whom I was married after I rejected a sayed-zaadi with whom I was duly betrothed as she looked too docile and I, drunk with the wine of youth then, had wanted somebody to straighten me. We have been reading in history about the treatment the Mangols meted out to the vanquished and the war prisoners but what Halaku khan had done with Baghdad pales before what she has done to me. Please advise me how to deal with the Mongol woman who needs no sword to cut one into pieces.
October 26, 2009 7:15 AM
But what about Mongols of whose progeny you claim to be. what Halaku khan had done with Baghdad pales before what she has done to me. Please advise me how to deal with the Mongol woman who needs no sword to cut one into pieces.[Readinglord]
==========================================
Sir,
Treat her and deal with her only through love. Love straightens everybody out even the most curved ones.
I reserve my opinion on Hazrat Yazeed Ibn Muawiyah [May Allah have mercy on his soul] and Hazrat Hussain Ibn Ali
[May Allah be pleased with him] because there are too many narrations regarding the Incident of Karbala and not a single one is free from Prejudice [compiled after more than 250 years and that too by one known Liar Abu Mihknaf Lut Bin Yahya Azdi and everybody else even Historian Tabari quoted from him and others like him Waqidi, Kalbi, and Kalbi's son – they were all extremists Rafizis, other incidents mentioned below were also reported by these Liars]. Above all the incident of Karbala was an event of History and has nothing to do with Islam, Quran, Hadith and Shariah which was perfect on the last sermon of Holy Prophet Mohammad [PBUH]. My opinion on Karbala and other such incident like the differences amongst Companions [May Allah be pleased with everyone] of Prophet Mohammad [PBUH] is this that I leave their affair to Allah because Quran says:
تِلْكَ أُمَّةٌ قَدْ خَلَتْ لَهَا مَا كَسَبَتْ وَلَكُم مَّا كَسَبْتُمْ وَلاَ تُسْأَلُونَ عَمَّا كَانُواْ يَعْمَلُونَ
English Translation:
Those are a people who have passed away; theirs is that which they earned and yours that which ye earn. And ye will not be asked of what they used to do. [AL-BAQARA (THE COW) Chapter 2 – Verse 141]
Regards
@A. Mughal
Thank you dear for your advice:
"Treat her and deal with her only through love. Love straightens everybody out even the most curved ones."
But you could not perhaps find a suitable Ayat-e-Qurani for this. I have one from Aaraf-e-Zamaani, Ghalib, who says:
'Mohabbat mein nahein kuchh farq jine aur marne mein
Ussi ko dekh kar jite hein jis kaafar pih dam nikle"
I wish I could have written down this in Urdu script but I don't know how to do it. I have got InPage installed in my pc, can paste Urdu anywhere but could not do so in a dialogue box which is not supported with its own key board. You seem to be expert in computering. So please advise me in this respect also.
With love!
Btw, we are now the only seafarers on this blog. Where has gone that Doctor Dhakkan, DJK? Ran away, perhaps?
@lord of lassan!
i am collecting something authentic from ahadith e mubarika for the perverts,freedom of epression type assholes and deviants who don't feel even slightest irritation on the blasphemy of Nabi e kareem(saw).
once a king asked a shepherd what is my price?
shepherd answered "29 pennies"
king asked, "why 29 pennies?"
shephered said because jesus(swt) was handed over to his enemies for 30 pennies therefore your price can not be equal or more than 30 pennies.
the answer made the king silent because he might know the highness and respect of an exalted prophet which unfortunately many modern days muslim do not have.
i know that arguments from ahdith will not change your mentality but i have to present for the sake of question and answer.
i am not the guy who run away from the middle of the discussion and believe me blasphemy is not the issue which can make me run away…..
it is just a matter of authenticity of two punsihments
1: asma binte marwan
2: abu fadak
rest are crystal clear….just wait
i am collecting something authentic from ahadith e mubarika for the perverts,freedom of epression type assholes and deviants who don’t feel even slightest irritation on the [Dr Jawwad Khan]
===================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
Haven't you find any Authentic Hadith on not to use bad language and that too just before the name of Prophet Mohammad [PBUH].
@lord of lassan! i am collecting something authentic from ahadith e mubarika for the perverts,freedom of epression type assholes and deviants who don’t feel even slightest irritation on the blasphemy of Nabi e kareem(saw).[Dr Jawwad Khan]
=========================
Punishment for Blasphemy as per Quran and Hadith:
"QUOTE"
Courtesy: Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid – Khobar – Saudi Arabia
The scholars are unanimously agreed that a Muslim who insults the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) becomes a kaafir and an apostate who is to be executed. This consensus was narrated by more than one of the scholars, such as Imaam Ishaaq ibn Raahawayh, Ibn al-Mundhir, al-Qaadi ‘Iyaad, al-Khattaabi and others. Al-Saarim al-Maslool.
This ruling is indicated by the Qur’aan and Sunnah.
In the Qur’aan it says (interpretation of the meaning):
“The hypocrites fear lest a Soorah (chapter of the Qur’aan) should be revealed about them, showing them what is in their hearts. Say: ‘(Go ahead and) mock! But certainly Allaah will bring to light all that you fear.’
If you ask them (about this), they declare: ‘We were only talking idly and joking.’ Say: ‘Was it at Allaah, and His Ayaat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) and His Messenger that you were mocking?’
Make no excuse; you disbelieved after you had believed”
[al-Tawbah 9:64-66]
This verse clearly states that mocking Allaah, His verses and His Messenger constitutes kufr, so that applies even more so to insulting. The verse also indicates that whoever belittles the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is also a kaafir, whether he was serious or joking.
With regard to the Sunnah, Abu Dawood (4362) narrated from ‘Ali that a Jewish woman used to insult the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and say bad things about him, so a man strangled her until she died, and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) ruled that no blood money was due in this case.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said in al-Saarim al-Maslool (1/162): This hadeeth is jayyid, and there is a corroborating report in the hadeeth of Ibn ‘Abbaas which we will quote below.
This hadeeth clearly indicates that it was permissible to kill that woman because she used to insult the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).
Abu Dawood (4361) narrated from Ibn ‘Abbaas that a blind man had a freed concubine (umm walad) who used to insult the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and say bad things about him. He told her not to do that but she did not stop, and he rebuked her but she did not heed him. One night, when she started to say bad things about the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and insult him, he took a short sword or dagger, put it on her belly and pressed it and killed her. The following morning that was mentioned to the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). He called the people together and said, “I adjure by Allah the man who has done this action and I adjure him by my right over him that he should stand up.” The blind man stood up and said, “O Messenger of Allaah, I am the one who did it; she used to insult you and say bad things about you. I forbade her, but she did not stop, and I rebuked her, but she did not give up her habit. I have two sons like pearls from her, and she was kind to me. Last night she began to insult you and say bad things about you. So I took a dagger, put it on her belly and pressed it till I killed her.” Thereupon the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Bear witness, there is no blood money due for her.”
(Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood, 3655)
It seems that this woman was a kaafir, not a Muslim, for a Muslim could never do such an evil action. If she was a Muslim she would have become an apostate by this action, in which case it would not have been permissible for her master to keep her; in that case it would not have been good enough if he were to keep her and simply rebuke her.
Al-Nasaa’i narrated (4071) that Abu Barzah al-Aslami said: A man spoke harshly to Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq and I said, ‘Shall I kill him?’ He rebuked me and said, ‘That is not for anyone after the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) .’” (Saheeh al-Nasaa’i, 3795)
It may be noted from this that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) had the right to kill whoever insulted him and spoke harshly to him, and that included both Muslims and kaafirs.
The second issue is: if a person who insulted the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) repents, should his repentance be accepted or not?
The scholars are agreed that if such a person repents sincerely and regrets what he has done, this repentance will benefit him on the Day of Resurrection and Allaah will forgive him.
But they differed as to whether his repentance should be accepted in this world and whether that means he is no longer subject to the sentence of execution.
Maalik and Ahmad were of the view that it should not be accepted, and that he should be killed even if he has repented.
They quoted as evidence the Sunnah and proper understanding of the ahaadeeth:
In the Sunnah, Abu Dawood (2683) narrated that Sa’d ibn Abi Waqqaas said: “On the Day of the Conquest of Makkah, the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) granted safety to the people except for four men and two women, and he named them, and Ibn Abi Sarh… As for Ibn Abi Sarh, he hid with ‘Uthmaan ibn ‘Affaan, and when the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) called the people to give their allegiance to him, he brought him to stand before the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). He said, “O Prophet of Allaah, accept the allegiance of ‘Abd-Allaah.” He raised his head and looked at him three times, refusing him, then he accepted his allegiance after the third time. Then he turned to his companions and said: “Was there not among you any smart man who could have got up and killed this person when he saw me refusing to give him my hand and accept his allegiance?” They said, “We do not know what is in your heart, O Messenger of Allaah. Why did you not gesture to us with your eyes?” He said, “It is not befitting for a Prophet to betray a person with a gesture of his eyes.”
(Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood, 2334)
This clearly indicates that in a case such as this apostate who had insulted the Prophet (S), it is not obligatory to accept his repentance, rather it is permissible to kill him even if he comes repentant.
‘Abd-Allaah ibn Sa’d was one of those who used to write down the Revelation, then he apostatized and claimed that he used to add whatever he wanted to the Revelation. This was a lie and a fabrication against the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and it was a kind of insult. Then he became Muslim again and was a good Muslim, may Allaah be pleased with him. Al-Saarim 115.
With regard to proper understanding of the ahaadeeth:
They said that insulting the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) has to do with two rights, the right of Allaah and the right of a human being. With regard to the right of Allaah, this is obvious, because it is casting aspersions upon His Message, His Book and His Religion. As for the right of a human being, this is also obvious, because it is like trying to slander the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) by this insult. In a case which involves both the rights of Allaah and the rights of a human being, the rights of the human beings are not dropped when the person repents, as in the case of the punishment for banditry, because if the bandit has killed someone, that means that he must be executed and crucified. But if he repents before he is caught, then the right of Allaah over him, that he should be executed and crucified, no longer applies, but the rights of other humans with regard to qisaas (retaliatory punishment) still stand. The same applies in this case. If the one who insulted the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) repents, then the rights of Allaah no longer apply, but there remains the right of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), which still stand despite his repentance.
If it is said, “Can we not forgive him, because during his lifetime the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) forgave many of those who had insulted him and he did not execute them?” The answer is:
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) sometimes chose to forgive those who had insulted him, and sometimes he ordered that they should be executed, if that served a greater purpose. But now his forgiveness is impossible because he is dead, so the execution of the one who insults him remains the right of Allaah, His Messenger and the believers, and the one who deserves to be executed cannot be let off, so the punishment must be carried out.
Al-Saarim al-Maslool, 2/438
Insulting the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is one of the worst of forbidden actions, and it constitutes kufr and apostasy from Islam, according to scholarly consensus, whether done seriously or in jest. The one who does that is to be executed even if he repents and whether he is a Muslim or a kaafir. If he repents sincerely and regrets what he has done, this repentance will benefit him on the Day of Resurrection and Allaah will forgive him.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) wrote a valuable book on this matter, entitled al-Saarim al-Maslool ‘ala Shaatim al-Rasool which every believer should read, especially in these times when a lot of hypocrites and heretics dare to insult the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) because they see that the Muslims are careless and feel little protective jealousy towards their religion and their Prophet, and they do not implement the shar’i punishment which would deter these people and their ilk from committing this act of blatant kufr.
"UNQUOTE"
i am collecting something authentic from ahadith e mubarika for the perverts,freedom of epression type assholes and deviants who don’t feel even slightest irritation on the [Dr Jawwad Khan]
======================
Authenitc Hadith on Abusive Language:
To swear at a Muslim is sinful and to kill a muslim is kufr (disbelief). [Bukhari & Muslim]
The Prophet (PBUH) said: "The believer is not a person who hurts others with words, or curses, or swears, or is foul-mouthed." [Bukhari]
Anas [May Allah be pleased with him] said: "The Prophet (PBUH) never used foul language or cursed, or swore. When he wanted to rebuke someone, he would say , 'What is wrong with him? May his forehead be covered with dust!" [Bukhari]
But you could not perhaps find a suitable Ayat-e-Qurani for this.[Readinglord]
=========================
Dear Sir,
Expand/Apply the of meaning of Mercy given in countless verses of Quran.
Virtues of Women in Hadith:
The Holy Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) said: Whoever maintains two girls till they attain maturity, he and I will come on the Resurrection Day like this; and he joined his fingers.{Muslim}.
The Holy Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) said: He who is involved (in the responsibility) of (bringing up) daughters, and he accords benevolent treatment towards them, there would be protection for him against Hell-Fire.{Agreed Upon Hadith}.
The Holy Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) said: Allah, I declare that it is a sin if anyone fails to safeguard the rights of two weak ones; orphans and women.{Nisa'i}.
The Holy Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) said: Act kindly towards women, for they were created from a rib and the most crooked part of a rib is its top. If you attempt to straighten it you will break it, and if you leave it alone it will remain crooked; so act kindly toward women.{Bukhari and Muslim}.
The Holy Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) said: A believer must not bear enmity against a believing woman; if he dislikes one of her characteristics he will be pleased with another. {Muslim}.
The Holy Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) said: The believers who show the most perfect faith are those who have the best disposition, and the best of you are those who are best to their wives. {Tirmidhi}.
Collected from Riyadh-us-Saleheen (Gardens of the Righteous) English Translation with Arabic Text) is a Compilation of verses from the Qur'an and hadith by Yahiya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi. It contains hadiths from the Six major Hadith collections.
Haven’t you find any Authentic Hadith on not to use bad language and that too just before the name of Prophet Mohammad [PBUH].
_______________________________________________
may Allah(swt) forgive me.it happend unintentionaly.i repent and ask the mercy from Allah(swt).
however i am not ashmed of using foul language..there are people in pakistan and all around the world who deserved much much more than using the word "@$$h–E".
i sincierly believe that no other word is suitable for them.
@Amir mughal!
is there any hadith regarding slandering against a most eminent religious scholar? and propagation of false claim without any investigation?
Comment by Aamir Mughal on October 29, 2009 @ 6:13 am
_______________________________________________________
bravo!
its really great to see you on track….although it is a rare scene.the response was brief and comprehensive.there is no need for me to present a bulk of sahih ahadith on this issue.
in sarim almaslool there also mentioned the two incidents of punishment of blasphemers.
1) asma bint e marwan
3) abu afak
shaik ul islam ibn taimia quoted these incidents with the refrence of "Kitab At-Tabaqat Al-Kabir" of ibn sa'd.
these incidents lack chain of narrators.therefore these incidents were crticized by many scholars.
Haven’t you find any Authentic Hadith on not to use bad language and that too just before the name of Prophet Mohammad [PBUH][dr jawwad khan ]
==========================
Dear Jawwad Sabah,
Produce the swear word "Gali" which is used by me against Mawdudi?
I have just quoted Mullah's Work/Research on Mawdudi's Deviant Beliefs, particularly Mawdudi's Blasphemous Comment against Prophets [PBUT] and Prophet Mohammad [PBUH]'s Companions [May Allah be pleased with them]{Read the references above].
however i am not ashmed of using foul language.[dr jawwad khan]
================
Dear Sir,
You are not ashamed of your foul mouth despite the Hadith below:
To swear at a Muslim is sinful and to kill a muslim is kufr (disbelief). [Bukhari & Muslim]
The Prophet (PBUH) said: “The believer is not a person who hurts others with words, or curses, or swears, or is foul-mouthed.” [Bukhari]
==================
Comment by Aamir Mughal on October 29, 2009 @ 6:13 am
bravo! its really great to see you on track [dr jawwad khan].
———-
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
You don't have to worry about me or anybody else's Salvation or being on right track. Allah will not ask you about us. We will Insha' Allah, answer Allah for our deeds. You just worry about your salvation.
Comment by Aamir Mughal on October 29, 2009 @ 6:13 am
bravo! its really great to see you on track [dr jawwad khan].
======================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
Instead of judging somebody/everybody faith, only go through these two Quranic Verses. And worry about your own deeds.
وَلَا تَزِرُ وَازِرَةٌ وِزْرَ أُخْرَى وَإِن تَدْعُ مُثْقَلَةٌ إِلَى حِمْلِهَا لَا يُحْمَلْ مِنْهُ شَيْءٌ وَلَوْ كَانَ ذَا قُرْبَى
Nor can a bearer of burdens bear another's burdens if one heavily laden should call another to (bear) his load. Not the least portion of it can be carried (by the other). Even though he be nearly related. [FATIR (THE ANGELS, ORIGNATOR) Chapter 35 – Verse 18]
أَلَّا تَزِرُ وَازِرَةٌ وِزْرَ أُخْرَى
وَأَن لَّيْسَ لِلْإِنسَانِ إِلَّا مَا سَعَى
That no laden one shall bear another's load, And that man hath only that for which he maketh effort, [AN-NAJM (THE STAR) Chapter 53 – Verse 38 and 39]
what a deviant world it is!
"Produce the swear word “Gali” which is used by me against Mawdudi?"
where did i said that? no you did not a swore at molana syed abul ala modudi.you attributed lies to him and continously without changing your tone you spread the slanders of blasphemy…this is sick and disgusting behaviour.i asked you many times outline his writing which is blasphemous….and your response is nothing but "ulema e deoband"
______________________________________________
"You are not ashamed of your foul mouth despite the Hadith below"
what should i say when i see the so called muslim who do not have slightest degree of respect for the shariyah.who openly and shamelessly denounce the islamic shariya…
(you want to remain a member of the club after criticizing its rules? this is hypocricy…say it loud that islam does not attract my modern mind…what is wrong in it?
why keep hiding the truth and cheating and lying about religion)
what should i say when i see a so called muslim acusing the Nabi e Kareem(saw) for pedophilia? (Nauzu billah)
if you have a respect for those guy then i am sorry to say that you are the bigger asshole than those so called muslims.
________________________________________
what should i say when i see the so called muslim who do not have slightest degree of respect for the shariyah.who openly and shamelessly denounce the islamic shariya [Dr Jawwad Khan]
=======================
Just keep doing this:
ادْعُ إِلِى سَبِيلِ رَبِّكَ بِالْحِكْمَةِ وَالْمَوْعِظَةِ الْحَسَنَةِ وَجَادِلْهُم بِالَّتِي هِيَ أَحْسَنُ إِنَّ رَبَّكَ هُوَ أَعْلَمُ بِمَن ضَلَّ عَن سَبِيلِهِ وَهُوَ أَعْلَمُ بِالْمُهْتَدِينَ
Call unto the way of thy Lord with wisdom and fair exhortation, and reason with them in the better way. Lo! thy Lord is Best Aware of him who strayeth from His way, and He is Best Aware of those who go aright. [AN-NAHL (THE BEE) Chapter 16 Verse 125]
=======================
no you did not a swore at molana syed abul ala modudi.you attributed lies to him and continously without changing your tone you spread the slanders of blasphemy…this is sick and disgusting behaviour.i asked you many times outline his writing which is blasphemous….and your response is nothing but “ulema e deoband” [Dr Jawwad Khan]
===========
Not only Deobandis but everybody. Are they all lying?
I don’t have to prepare a case against Mawdudi, the case is already prepared by Mawdudi himself and you favourite Mullahs as well:
There is book written “Khilafat wa Malookiyat Ki Tareekhi Aur Shariee Haisiyat [Authenticity and Relity of Caliphat and Kingdom by Mawdudui] by Hafiz Salahuddin Yousuf [Editor of Weekly Eitisaam, Lahore Pakistan , he is a Salafi Scholar and if you get that book then please note that in preface following Deobandi and even Barelvi Scholar praised the above book on the refutation ofr Mawdudi's Deviant and Blasphemic Beliefs regarding the Companions of Prophet Mohammad. You have already praised Deobandi Mullahs in one of your mail and following Mullahs [not ordinary Jahil Taliban] praised the book:
1 – Mufti Muhammad Shafi Usmani [Deobandi]
2 – Justice Taqi Usmani [Deobandi]
3 – Maulana Ziauddin Islahi [Daar ul Musanifeen Azam Garh India]
4 – Maulana Yousuf Ludhiyanvi [Binnori Town – Deobandi]
5 – Maulana Ghulamullah Khan [Rawalpindi – Deobandi]
6 – Dr Israr Ahmed [Former Deputy of Mawdudi]
7 – Maulana Amee Ahsan Islahi [Former number 2 of Mawdudi]
8 – Agha Shoorish Kashmiri [Noted Scholar and Journalist]
9 – Maulana Manzoor Naimani [One of the founder of Jamat-e-Islami and Deobandi scholar and also refuted Mawdudi in his book on Islamic Revolution of Iran]
10 – Safi ur Rahman Mubarakpuri [Author of Prophet Mohammad – PBUH's biography Ar Raheeq Al Makhtoom and he is an Indian Scholar and a Salafi]
11 – Yousuf Saleem Chishti [Deobandi Sufi Scholar]
12 – Maulana Abul Hasan Nadvi [Former Head of Darul Ulomm Deoband and Member Board of Medina University Saudi Arabia]
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
These are not some Deobandi Ulema:
1 – Maulana Yousuf Ludhiyanvi – Binnori Town refuted Mawdudi.
2 – Mawlana Yousuf Binnori – Founder of Binnori Town refuted Mawdudi
3 – Mawlana Abdul Majid Daryabadi pupil of Ashraf Ali Thanwi refuted Mawdudi.
no you did not a swore at molana syed abul ala modudi.you attributed lies to him and continously without changing your tone you spread the slanders of blasphemy…this is sick and disgusting behaviour.i asked you many times outline his writing which is blasphemous… and your response is nothing but “ulema e deoband” [Dr Jawwad Khan]
=====================
These and others and other mullahs are the same lobby which is also against repealing Blasphemy Law, this is the same Deobandi Lobby which is against Ghamidi and Khalid Zaheer. Why the same lobby and their comment is not acceptable against Mawdudi and JI and their deviant beliefs????
Comment by Aamir Mughal on October 29, 2009 @ 6:13 am
Punishment for Blasphemy as per Quran and Hadith:
Courtesy: Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid – Khobar – Saudi Arabia – bravo! its really great to see you on track…[Comment by dr jawwad khan on October 29, 2009 @ 11:38 am]
==============================
Dear Jawad Sahab,
I have quoted a Salafi-Ahle-Hadith-Wahabi Scholar of Saudi Arabia on Blasphemy Law and you are praising me. What happened to your comment on Wahabi Scholars?
“QUOTE”
moulana abul aala modudi (rehmatullah aleh) was a mujadid of 20the century..a great man with a great mind.not like real pervert wahabis who just lick their own shit.[ Comment by dr jawwad khan on September 30, 2009 @ 4:26 am The Brouhaha over Blackwater continues Posted by Teeth Maestro September 27, 2009]
“UNQUOTE”
How could one learn something from a book whose author belongs to an School of Thought i.e. Wahabi [as per you "lick their own shit]
what should i say when i see a so called muslim acusing the Nabi e Kareem(saw) for pedophilia? (Nauzu billah) [Dr Jawwad Khan]
==================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
Instead of bad mouthing I would convince [Allah's Willing] that he/she that they are wrong.
—
if you have a respect for those guy then i am sorry to say that you are the bigger asshole than those so called muslims. [Dr Jawwad Khan]
====
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
Respecting is one thing and behaving with good manners even to the opponents is entirely different. Watch your language above in the light of your search for Authentic Hadith on Blasphemy. Is Blaspehmy Law is the only Law for which you are seeking Hadith. What happened to these Hadiths regarding good manners.
======
you are the bigger asshole [Dr Jawwad Khan]
=====
Authenitc Hadith on Good Manners[observe/note your own language above Dr Jawwad]
Abu Huraira [May Allah be pleased with him], said that the Prophet Mohammad [PBUH], said, "If one has good manners, one may attain the same level of merit as those who spend their nights in prayer." [Bukhari, Mustadrik Al Hakim, and Abu Dawud]
Abu Darda' [May Allah be pleased with him] reported that the Prophet Mohammad [PBUH], said, "Nothing is weightier on the Scale of Deeds than one's good manners." [Bukhari]
Abu Hurairah [May Allah be pleased with him] reported that the Prophet Mohammad [PBUH], said, "And what is most likely to send people to Paradise? Being conscious of Allah and good manners." [Bukhari, Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah, and Musnad Ahmad Bin Hanbal]
The Prophet Mohammad [PBUH], said, "He who does not show mercy to our young or show esteem for our elders is not one of us." [Bukhar Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, and Mustadrik Al Hakim]
Abu Huraira, [May Allah be pleased with him], said, "I heard Abu al Qasim (Prophet Mohammad [PBUH]), say, 'The best among you in Islam are those with the best manners, so long as they develop a sense of understanding.' [Bukhari]
The Prophet Mohammad [PBUH] said: "The most beloved of Allah's servants to Allah are those with the best manners." [At-Tabarani]
'Abd Allah ibn 'Amr [May Allah be pleased with him] said, "The Prophet Mohammad [PBUH], was never obscene or coarse. Rather, he used to tell us that the best among us were those with the best manners." [Bukhari, Muslim, and Tirmidhi]
(you want to remain a member of the club after criticizing its rules? this is hypocricy…say it loud that islam does not attract my modern mind…what is wrong in it? why keep hiding the truth and cheating and lying about religion)[Dr Jawwad Khan]
====================
Dear Jawwad Shaba,
Which Islamic I criticized [please provide my statement with reference], I have just criticized the manners in which Islamic Laws are used in Pakistan and abused. Islam is Islam and no where in clash with modern civilization or mind.
Where have I hidden the truth? Please provide my staement rather I have been firm on Quran and Hadith Law of Blasphemy and also provided the background of the same.
==============
this is hypocricy…say it loud that islam does not attract my modern mind…what is wrong in it? why keep hiding the truth and cheating and lying about religion)[Dr Jawwad Khan]
=======
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
You are issuing a Fatwa of Takfir [between the lines above] on me and anybody who differ with you:
Read this:
Whoever offers prayers as we do and turns his face to our Qiblah and eats the animal slaughtered by us, he is a Muslim for whom is the covenant of Allah and the covenant of the Messenger of Allah; so do not violate Allah's covenant." [Sahih Bukhari]
“Ibn Umar related that the Holy Prophet said: If a Muslim calls another kafir, then if he is a kafir let it be so; otherwise, he [the caller] is himself a kafir.''(Sunnan Abu Dawood)
“Abu Zarr reported that the Holy Prophet said: No man accuses another man of being a sinner, or of being a kafir, but it reflects back on him if the other is not as he called him.''(Bukhari)
“Withhold [your tongues] from those who say `There is no god but Allah' — do not call them kafir. Whoever calls a reciter of `There is no god but Allah' as a kafir, is nearer to being a kafir himself.'' (Tabarani, reported from Abdullah Ibn Omar)
If the above Hadiths do not satisfy then read this!
Usaamah bin Zaid reported,
“Allaah’s Messenger sent us towards Al-Huruqa, and in the morning we attacked them and defeated them. I and an Ansari man followed a man from among them and when we overwhelmed him, he said, “La ilaha illal-Lah.” On hearing that, the Ansari man stopped, but I killed him by stabbing him with my spear. When we returned, the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) came to know about that and he said:
"O Usaamah! Did you kill him after he had said “La ilaha ilal-Lah?” I said, “But he said so only to save himself.” He kept on repeating that so often that I wished I had not embraced Islaam before that day. [Agreed upon, and this is the wording of Bukhari]
and in another version in Sahih Muslim about the same incident:
“Did you tear open his heart to see what was in it?'' [Muslim]
Instead of judging somebody/everybody faith, only go through these two Quranic Verses. And worry about your own deeds.
_______________________________________
nice verses! always reminds some thing missing.
however there are some other verses i want to quote for those who are obscessed by western concept of "respect"
"And when it is said to them (hypocrites): "Believe as the people (followers of Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم, Al-Ansar and Al-Muhajirun) have believed," they say: "Shall we believe as the fools have believed?" Verily, they are the fools, but they know not.
(Al-Baqara- 2 :13)
“And there should be a group amongst you who invite towards good, order for acknowledged virtues, forbid from sin and these it is that are the successful ones”
(Ale Imran- 3:104).
The believers, men and women, are protectors of each other: they enjoin what is right and forbid what is evil."
(sura Tauba, 9:71)
"The hypocrites, both men and women, proceed one from another. They enjoin the wrong and forbid the right…"
(sura Tauba, 9:67)
It is narrated on the authority of Tariq b. Shihab: It was Marwan who initiated (the practice) of delivering khutbah (address) before the prayer on the 'Id day. A man stood up and said: Prayer should precede khutbah. He (Marwan) remarked, This (practice) has been done away with. Upon this Abu Sa'id remarked: This man has performed (his duty) laid on him. I heard the Messenger of Allah as saying: He who amongst you sees something abominable should modify it with the help of his hand; and if he has not strength enough to do it, then he should do it with his tongue, and if he has not strength enough to do it, (even) then he should (abhor it) from his heart, and that is the least of faith.
(sahih muslim -Book #001, Hadith #0079)
Once a person from the tribe of Khath'am came to the Prophet and asked him: "O the Messenger of God! Please inform me about the best [teaching] of Islam."
The Prophet: "Believing in God."
Khath'ami: "Then what?"
The Prophet: "Maintaining [good] relations with the relatives."
Khath'ami: "Then what?"
The Prophet: "Bidding the good and forbidding the evil."
Then the Khath'ami asked, "And please also tell me what are the worst deeds in view of Allah?"
The Prophet: "Shirk: associating a person or a thing with Allah."
Khath'ami: "Then what?"
The Prophet: "Severing relations with the relatives."
Khath'ami: "Then what?"
The Prophet: "Promoting evil and forbidding the good."
and last but not least my favourite sura Al Asr:
"By Al-'Asr (the time).
Verily, man is in loss,
Except those who believe and do righteous good deeds, and recommend one another to the truth [i.e. order one another to perform all kinds of good deeds (Al-Ma'ruf) which Allah has ordained, and abstain from all kinds of sins and evil deeds (Al-Munkar which Allah has forbidden], and recommend one another to patience (for the sufferings, harms, and injuries which one may encounter in Allah's Cause during preaching His religion of Islamic Monotheism or Jihad).
in the end of this pointless discussion.
i must say that no matter what i can't respect the blasphemer,deviant and perverts.
you like it…do it by yourself do not expect me.
regarding mannerism i have this weakness. it is quite obvious from my posts.but who do not have weaknesses?
may Allah(swt) give me courage to overcome my weaknesses.
if you have some thing to say in the defence of javed ghamidi and khalid zaheer i shall be happy to join otherwise i have some important work to do.
who are obscessed by western concept of “respect” [Dr Jawwad Khan]
======================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
Do you find Western Concept of Respect in the following Quranic Verse
ادْعُ إِلِى سَبِيلِ رَبِّكَ بِالْحِكْمَةِ وَالْمَوْعِظَةِ الْحَسَنَةِ وَجَادِلْهُم بِالَّتِي هِيَ أَحْسَنُ إِنَّ رَبَّكَ هُوَ أَعْلَمُ بِمَن ضَلَّ عَن سَبِيلِهِ وَهُوَ أَعْلَمُ بِالْمُهْتَدِينَ
Call unto the way of thy Lord with wisdom and fair exhortation, and reason with them in the better way. Lo! thy Lord is Best Aware of him who strayeth from His way, and He is Best Aware of those who go aright. [AN-NAHL (THE BEE) Chapter 16 Verse 125]
i must say that no matter what i can’t respect the blasphemer,deviant and perverts. you like it…do it by yourself do not expect me.[Dr Jawwad Khan]
==========================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
Produce my statement wherein I have praised any Blasphemer.
shaikh Anwar Al Awlaki on blasphemy:
"Few days ago the Book of Allah Almighty was used as target practice by a US soldier! Where did
this happen? It happened in a Muslim country in the heart of the Muslim world! And what
happened? The response from the Muslim world was mute!
Earlier when the Danish cartoon controversy happened, the Muslim world was on fire, but then
when the Swedish cartoon incident occurred which was much worse, the reaction was less and
now we see that the reaction is less.
So brothers and sisters, our enemies have successfully desensitized us!
When it happened the first time, everybody was thinking about it and condemning it and
concerned about it and then slowly and slowly we got used to this!
And now, horrendous things happened! Blasphemy to the greatest extent! But what is the
reaction? Very little!
So brothers and sisters, lets go back and see how things were then! Because that is what will
revive our spirit and that is the way we should follow the Sahabah (May Allah be pleased with
them)"
"OUR ENEMIES HAVE SUCCESSFULLY DESENSITIZED US"
"the dust will never settle down" by shaikh Anwar Al Awlaki:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/21881309
“the dust will never settle down” by shaikh Anwar Al Awlaki:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/21881309 [Dr Jawwad Khan]
==============================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
Nobody has any problem with Mullahs but they are not united.
Medina University [Saudi Arabia] refuted shaikh Anwar Al Awlaki's Deviant Ideology.
Our Shaykh, we would like to present to you some of the mistakes of a man called Anwar Awlaki who is Yemeni and is currently residing in Yemen, but he used to be in the U.S. He has a lot of affect on the youth all over the west and they raise him to the level of the scholars. Awlaki has served as an Imam in Colorado, California, and most recently in the Washington, D.C. area where he headed the Dar Al-Hijrah Islamic Centre and was the Muslim Chaplain at George Washington University
http://www.ibad-ur-rahman.org/The%20salafee%20res…
From the standpoint of what I heard of his background, his “shaykhs’, and his ideas in general, is it clear that this individual is affiliated with the Ikhwaan al-Muslimoon (muslim brotherhood). Especially one of their branches called the “Suroorees”. The muslim brotherhood group has a distinct orientation, and their concerns revolve around certain contemporary issues in which they oppose those firmly rooted in knowledge. They oppose the scholars in their speech and verdicts.
Therefore if this man builds his orientation upon this thinking and ideology of those groups affiliated with, and derived from the likes of the Islaamic Group of Pakistan, at whose head was al-Mawdoodee; the Muslim Brotherhood group of Egypt , and Hamaas of Palestine, (then know) that all of these groups have a specific ideology for themselves.
“OUR ENEMIES HAVE SUCCESSFULLY DESENSITIZED US”
“the dust will never settle down” by shaikh Anwar Al Awlaki:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/21881309 [Dr Jawwad Khan]
============================
New Refutation of Anwar Awlakee by Shaikh Abdullaah Al-Jarboo
http://www.ibad-ur-rahman.org/New%20Refutation%20…
Listen the refutation [if you can understand Arabic]
By the way this Sheikh Anwar Awlakee is considered this, read the Saudi Documents quoted in the link below [References and Links are at the end of the post]
Sufi Muhammad's Religious Edict against Saudi Arabia & Iran
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2009/05/maulana-…
i don't care about refutation shit.
since 6 days i am searching on net a useful scholarly article about blasphemy in islam….and what i found are the sites after sites either spewing venom against islam or clones of javed ghamidi ready for scholarly stipteasing ….shaikh anwar awlaki was the only person who makes some sense.
frankly i do not know much about him. i have read him on jihad and blasphemy….for me he is too good.a scholar remained uninfected by the swine flu of of mind
since 6 days i am searching on net a useful scholarly article about blasphemy in islam [Dr Jawwad Khan]
=========================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
This may help you. 14 Part of Documentary and Text. Late. Ahmed Deedat singlehandedly and very peacefully [without badmouthing anyone like you have in many posts above] intellectually fought with Salman Rushdie and his Satanic Book. Watch the Video and read the text.
Can You Stomach The Best Of Rushdie? By Ahmed Deedat
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/11/can-you-…
Sheikh Ahmed Deedat-How Rushdie Fooled the West?(1/14)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7BjcLrck44
Dear Dr Jawwad Sahab,
What your abusive couldn't do and will not achieve anything in future, was achieved by Late. Ahmed Deedat i.e. He read the book and through arguments and got Satanic Verses banned in South Africa.
Sheikh Ahmed Deedat-How Rushdie Fooled the West?(2/14)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q61xZX3xxUE
@amir mughal!
knock it off….i am getting bored now by these bhashans.
cheating,deception and hypocricy are much more disgusting than foul language.
bottom line javed ghamidi and dr.khalid zaheer are two biggets lying sons of bitch and they deserve nothing but shit.
i insist on my foul language against those lowlives pigs meanwhile you can stop reading my posts.
javed ghamidi and dr.khalid zaheer are two biggets lying sons of bitch and they deserve nothing but shit. i insist on my foul language against those lowlives pigs meanwhile you can stop reading my posts. [Dr Jawwad Khan]
======================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
I have uploaded Late. Ahmed Deedat's reply [video] on Satanic Verses on my blog with the text. Do note as to what Deedat has said through Quran about using Abusive Language even using bad title.
Can You Stomach The Best Of Rushdie? By Ahmed Deedat
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/11/can-you-…
What your abusive couldn't do and will not achieve anything in future, was achieved by Late. Ahmed Deedat i.e. He read the book and through arguments and got Satanic Verses banned in South Africa.
_____________________________________________________
inspite the great deal of respect for late shaikh ahmed deedat i believe that his lifelong struggle and his work has been wasted…..how? just look at the mentality which has been born and nourishing day by day at very higher pace.
one day couple of months ago while having arguments with the young,polite,well mannered and well educated supporter of javed ghamidi, i presented sahih ahadith clearly refuting his many false claim….the answer made me shocked.when young man politely told me that we need to reconcile with the spirit of time….
what does it mean? reconciliation with the spirit of time?
we are living in a world where dajjali system rules….where no truth,no knowledge and no uphill struggle can be fruitful…i bet these two guys will be successful in amending the current so called blasphemy law.
dajjali system made it easy…what you have to do is just using tv as a weapon for controling and seducing the minds of educated semi religious,proliberal graduates.
we are living in dajjali world where truth becomes stranger than fiction.
you are the bigger asshole [dr jawwad khan on October 29, 2009 @ 2:11 pm]
i insist on my foul language against those lowlives pigs meanwhile you can stop reading my posts. [Dr Jawwad Khan]
======================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
If you insist on abusing then what about these Hadiths of Prophet Mohammad [PBUH]
Authenitc Hadith on Good Manners[observe/note your own language above Dr Jawwad]
o swear at a Muslim is sinful and to kill a muslim is kufr (disbelief). [Bukhari & Muslim]
The Prophet (PBUH) said: “The believer is not a person who hurts others with words, or curses, or swears, or is foul-mouthed.” [Bukhari]
Abu Huraira [May Allah be pleased with him], said that the Prophet Mohammad [PBUH], said, “If one has good manners, one may attain the same level of merit as those who spend their nights in prayer.” [Bukhari, Mustadrik Al Hakim, and Abu Dawud]
Abu Darda’ [May Allah be pleased with him] reported that the Prophet Mohammad [PBUH], said, “Nothing is weightier on the Scale of Deeds than one’s good manners.” [Bukhari]
Abu Hurairah [May Allah be pleased with him] reported that the Prophet Mohammad [PBUH], said, “And what is most likely to send people to Paradise? Being conscious of Allah and good manners.” [Bukhari, Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah, and Musnad Ahmad Bin Hanbal]
The Prophet Mohammad [PBUH], said, “He who does not show mercy to our young or show esteem for our elders is not one of us.” [Bukhar Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, and Mustadrik Al Hakim]
Abu Huraira, [May Allah be pleased with him], said, “I heard Abu al Qasim (Prophet Mohammad [PBUH]), say, ‘The best among you in Islam are those with the best manners, so long as they develop a sense of understanding.’ [Bukhari]
The Prophet Mohammad [PBUH] said: “The most beloved of Allah’s servants to Allah are those with the best manners.” [At-Tabarani]
‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Amr [May Allah be pleased with him] said, “The Prophet Mohammad [PBUH], was never obscene or coarse. Rather, he used to tell us that the best among us were those with the best manners.” [Bukhari, Muslim, and Tirmidhi]
inspite the great deal of respect for late shaikh ahmed deedat i believe that his lifelong struggle and his work has been wasted…..how? [Dr Jawwad Khan]
just look at the mentality which has been born and nourishing day by day at very higher pace. one day couple of months ago while having arguments with the young,polite,well mannered and well educated supporter of javed ghamidi, i presented sahih ahadith clearly refuting his many false claim [Dr Jawwad Khan]
======================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
How can the services of Late Ahmed Deedat be wasted with the statement of an ignorant and even if that educated supporter of Ghamidi [prove it by providing your statement and his statement] would have been related with Ahmed Deedat then Ahmed Deedat is responsible for his own deeds not the supporter of Ghamidi.
Quran says..
وَلَا تَزِرُ وَازِرَةٌ وِزْرَ أُخْرَى وَإِن تَدْعُ مُثْقَلَةٌ إِلَى حِمْلِهَا لَا يُحْمَلْ مِنْهُ شَيْءٌ وَلَوْ كَانَ ذَا قُرْبَى
Nor can a bearer of burdens bear another’s burdens if one heavily laden should call another to (bear) his load. Not the least portion of it can be carried (by the other). Even though he be nearly related. [FATIR (THE ANGELS, ORIGNATOR) Chapter 35 – Verse 18]
أَلَّا تَزِرُ وَازِرَةٌ وِزْرَ أُخْرَى
وَأَن لَّيْسَ لِلْإِنسَانِ إِلَّا مَا سَعَى
That no laden one shall bear another’s load, And that man hath only that for which he maketh effort, [AN-NAJM (THE STAR) Chapter 53 – Verse 38 and 39]
agar javed ghamidi ko naheen roka gaya to har gali say aik salman rushdi niklay ga…
he must be stopped now.. right now… by any means necessary.
i bet these two guys will be successful in amending the current so called blasphemy law.[Dr Jawwad Khan]
=====================
Dear Jawwad Sahab,
Sir, You are a Pious Pakistani Muslim and you have a Constitutional Right to file petition in the Court of Law [Shariat Bench] therefore file a Constitutional Petition against them because Judiciary is Free. Read yourself.
Girl’s flogging not true picture of Islam, says LHC judge By Our Reporter Sunday, 12 Apr, 2009 05:08 AM PST
http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-…
Amir Mughal,
Honestly, you have so much time at your disposal. Why don't you go and help out Edhi in his efforts…Because you are failed at blogging. You have to come to other blogs in order to scribble some graffiti.
Get some life, breath some fresh air or may be find a job at a DHOBEE GHAAAT.
Because you are failed at blogging. You have to come to other blogs in order to scribble some graffiti. [asim]
———————–
Dear Sir,
I didn't know that my messages of Quran and Hadith above are graffiti for you.
Best Regards
وَلَا تَزِرُ وَازِرَةٌ وِزْرَ أُخْرَى وَإِن تَدْعُ مُثْقَلَةٌ إِلَى حِمْلِهَا لَا يُحْمَلْ مِنْهُ شَيْءٌ وَلَوْ كَانَ ذَا قُرْبَى
أَلَّا تَزِرُ وَازِرَةٌ وِزْرَ أُخْرَى
وَأَن لَّيْسَ لِلْإِنسَانِ إِلَّا مَا سَعَى
___________________________________________________
Dear Amir Mughal!
you presented a very wrong and infact dangerous interpretations of these above menttioned ayat e muqqadisa.
these aayat means that no one will share the burden of others wrong doing.the matters rewards and punishments will depend on personal deeds.no one shall not be punished due to wrong doing of others…
HOWEVER
this rule DOES NOT relieve you from your duties.
what are the duties? duties are:
“And there should be a group amongst you who invite towards good, order for acknowledged virtues, forbid from sin and these it is that are the successful ones”
(Ale Imran- 3:104).
"The believers, men and women, are protectors of each other: they enjoin what is right and forbid what is evil.”
(sura Tauba, 9:71)
similar order is also narrated in hadith e mubarika:
"…..I heard the Messenger of Allah as saying: He who amongst you sees something abominable should modify it with the help of his hand; and if he has not strength enough to do it, then he should do it with his tongue, and if he has not strength enough to do it, (even) then he should (abhor it) from his heart, and that is the least of faith."
(sahih muslim -Book #001, Hadith #0079)
Dear Amir Mughal!
muslim is like a traffic sargeant on the signal.if some one breaks the signal and later on in high speed he crasehes his car and kills some one .then only the violator will be punished not the traffic sergeant HOWEVER the traffic seargent will be accountable on not stopping the violator.
"farz e kifaya" has the shares the some degree of this logic.i am not bound to offer funeral prayer of some one
living far from my house. but if no one offers the funeral prayers then i will also be accountable along with all the people of that neighborhood.