:::: MENU ::::

Letter to CJ from Naeem Bokhari

I would like to share a very interesting letter I just received on email, written by Supreme Court Advocate Naeem Bohkari addressed to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry. It is a definite ‘must read’ for all Pakistanis

Start quote
Justice Iftikhar Muhammad ChaudhryMr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry
Chief Justice
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Islamabad
Pakistan

My Lord:

I write this letter as an Officer of the Supreme Court of Pakistan; as an Advocate enrolled in the apex Court since 1984 and in the High Courts since 1972; as an Attorney who has paid more income tax from his earnings in the legal profession than many of my friends, colleagues and seniors elevated to the Bench; and as a stake-holder in the dispensation of justice, intimately and vitally interested in the functioning of the Supreme Court.

Many judges who adorn the Bench in the Supreme Court and the High Court know me over decades, as a person endowed by nature with a pleasant disposition and acceptance of human failings. Towards the courts, my approach has always been of consistent and continuous display of respect and humility. I bow out of conviction, not compulsion. I use the words “My Lords”, because I want to, not because I have to. As an Attorney, I look up to the Court and want to see it on a high pedestal of dignity, compassion and justice, tempered with mercy.

I have seen my Supreme Court headed by Chief Justice Hamood-ur-Rahman, Chief Justice Muhammad Yaqub Ali, Chief Justice S. Anwar-ul-Haq, Chief Justice Mohammad Haleem and how the Court functioned under them in the 1970s/1980s.

I witnessed the proceedings for the ouster of Chief Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, became aware that the then Prime Minister of Pakistan, Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, had ‘worked’ on some judges of the Supreme Court and saw the physical assault on the Court.

I was appalled at the manner in which Chief Justice Irshad Hasan Khan led the Supreme Court and pained at the insinuations against Justice Sheikh Riaz Ahmad, when he was the Chief Justice.

I was horrified by the establishment of a Bench of five judges constituted by Chief Justice Nazim Hussain Siddiqui to determine whether reduction in the retirement age for judges was constitutional or not. This was clearly designed to block your appointment. I was against the idea of Mr. Amirul Mulk Mengal being made the Chief Justice before you. Within the limits of my influence (which I readily admit to be very limited), I was totally for you to become the Chief Justice. Justice Javed Buttar is aware of my position, as is the Attorney General of Pakistan. The accelerated issue of the notification appointing you the Chief Justice put Justice Siddiqui’s move to rest.

I believed that you were vigorous, capable of lifting up the Supreme Court, creating an espirit-de-corps among your brother judges, restoring the dignity and grandeur of the apex Court, particularly considering the long tenure before you.

Alas this has not come about.

I am not perturbed by your insistence on protocol (despite my belief that the Chief Justice would rise in the eyes of everybody if he walked from his residence to the Supreme Court and hooters, police escort, flags is just fluff, not the substance of an office).

I am mildly amused at your desire to be presented a guard of honour in Peshawar. I am titillated by the appropriation of aMercedes-Benz car or is it cars, the use of the Government of the Punjab’s airplane to offer Fateha in Multan, to Sheikhupura for Fateha on a Government of the Punjab helicopter, to Hyderabad on a Government of the Sind’s plane for attending a High Court function, the huge amount spent in refurbishing the chamber and residence of the Chief Justice, the reservation for yourself of a wing in Supreme Court Judges guest house in Lahore, the permanent occupation by the Supreme Court of the official residence of the Chief Justice of Sind, who per force lives in the basement of his father’s house. As his class fellow in the Government College, Lahore, I can vouch that living in the basement will do him no harm.

I am not perturbed that Dr. Arsalaan (your son) secured 16/100 in the English paper for the Civil Services Examination, that there is a case against him in some court in Baluchistan, that from the Health Department in Baluchistan he has shifted to the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), that he has obtained training in the Police Academy, that he reportedly drives a BMW 7-Series car, that there is a complaint against him with the National Accountability Bureau (NAB).

My grievances and protests are different.

I am perturbed that the Supreme Court should issue a clarificatory statement on his behalf. I am perturbed that Justice (Retd.) Wajihuddin Ahmed should be constrained to advise you on television that “people who live in glass houses should not throw stones at others”. I am perturbed that the Chief Justice should summon Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman to his chambers on Dr. Arsalaan’s account.

I am appalled that you announce decisions in Court, while in the written judgment an opposite conclusion is recorded.

In the Petition for leave to appeal filed by Dr. Sher Afghan Niazi, Federal Minister for Parliamentary Affairs (in which Respondent’s Counsels were Mr. Khalid Anwar and Mr. Qadir Saeed), you refused to grant leave in open Court and yet in the written order, leave was granted to Dr. Sher Afghan Niazi.

On 15-2-2007, Mr. Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim complained that in open Court you had accepted his appeal but dismissed the same in the judgement, subsequently recorded.

If Mr. Khalid Anwar, a former Minister of Law and Parliamentary Affairs, and Mr Fakrhuddin, Senior Counsel, are treated in this manner, the fate of lesser known lawyers would certainly be far worse.

My grievances also concern the manner in which the last and highest court of appeal is dispensing justice, under your leadership.

My Lord, the dignity of lawyers is consistently being violated by you. We are treated harshly, rudely, brusquely and nastily. We are not heard. We are not allowed to present our case. There is little scope for advocacy. The words used in the Bar Room for Court No. 1 are “the slaughter house”. We are cowed down by aggression from the Bench, led by you. All we receive from you is arrogance, aggression and belligerence. You also throw away the file, while contemptuously announcing: “This is dismissed”.

Yet this aggression is not for everyone. When Mr. Sharifuddin Pirzada appears, your Lordship’s demeanour and appearance is not just sugar and honey. You are obsequious to the point of meekness. So apart from violating our dignity, which the Constitution commands to be inviolable, we suffer discrimination in your Court.

I am not raising the issue of verbal onslaughts and threats to Police Officers and other Civil Servants, who have the misfortune to be summoned, degraded and reminded that “This is the Supreme Court”.

The way in which My Lord conducts proceedings is not conducive to the process of justice. In fact, it obstructs due process and constitutes contempt of the Supreme Court itself.

I am pained at the wide publicity to cases taken up by My Lord in the Supreme Court under the banner of Fundamental Rights. The proceedings before the Supreme Court can conveniently and easily be referred to the District and Sessions Judges. I am further pained by the media coverage of the Supreme Court on the recovery of a female. In the bar room, this is referred to as a “Media Circus”.

My Lord, this communication may anger you and you are in any case prone to get angry in a flash, but do reflect upon it. Perhaps you are not cognizant of what your brother judges feel and say about you.

My Lord, before a rebellion arises among your brother judges (as in the case of Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah), before the Bar stands up collectively and before the entire matter is placed before the Supreme Judicial Council, there may be time to change and make amends.

I hope you have the wisdom and courage to make these amends and restore serenity, calm, compassion, patience and justice tempered with mercy to my Supreme Court.

My Lord, we all live in the womb of time and are judged, both by the present and by history. The judgement about you, being rendered in the present, is adverse in the extreme.

Yours faithfully,

Naeem BokhariNAEEM BOKHARI
Advocate
Supreme Court of
Pakistan
Islamabad, Pakistan

End quote

Google Groups Beta
Subscribe to the White Band for Justice Campaign
Email:
Visit this group


170 Comments

  • Inam |

    iram shahzadi,

    …slute Naeem Bukhari?

    slute?? is this a new word out of some combinations?

    or are you saying that Naeem Bukhari is a slut?

  • Muhammad Usman Ali |

    Naeem Bukhari ka apna character kitna saaf hai jo he is poining Cj..usay CJ ki bmw nazar ati hai,helicopters nazar atay hain,what about our politicians,jo phirtay cruisers mai hain aur tax aisay detay hain jaisay qabil cycle k b nhi.he never wrote a letter about them..

  • Ali Riaz |

    Naeem Bokhari: Another Secular (Sickular) Swine from the Musharraf-ul-Haraam Camp.

  • tariq |

    PLEASE REPLY :CHIEF JUSTICE IS GREAT JUDGE OF MUSLIM WORLD AFTER KHULFA-E-RASHEDEEN ON THIS POINT OF NRO DECISION.

    1. Chief justice saib is really great and honest ,after reading NRO decision whole muslin world will proud on CJ that he did not protected himself , did not care about himself during writing this decision against NRO,as CJ mentioned that all orders of Attorney General including about ending case of Switzerland was wrong and all decision are canceled ,so clearly order of Attorney General regarding 70% allegations against CJ Ifthekhar Ch. before first time reinstatement was taken back by Attorney General of Musharaf GOVT. So now case 70% allegation against CJ has been reopened again because that order also has been canceled . Due to back of 70% allegations CJ was exonerated by the Bench. In remaining 30% allegations.

    2. Those 70% allegations against CJ has been automatically opened and CJ has to leave his present position , hearing will be started against CJ.

    3. On this great decision thanks CJ Saib.

  • dilawer |

    Please read againg last 4 points are new.

    Please send it to every where

    Please take action against Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary Saib.

    1. Over Media is honest but not professional, easily can be trapped by any traitor of this country. As proof following proved facts are mentioned.

    2. Please don’t destroy your self and say words which are not justiceful. Because according to Hadith all words are accumulated and same returns to its speaker.

    3. Decision against NRO is not matter but where is justice, about 10 Years old Proved case,which is pending with Supreme Court about conspiracy against this country Same like Bangladesh (Country was broken by Nawaz Sharif and others that day when Nawaz Saib took amount to restrain PPP from Punjab) Same like Bangladesh.

    4. Decision against NRO is not matter but where is justice, when Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary Saib.Reinstated first time after deal with Musharaf that Musharaf will take bake 70%allegatios against Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary Saib and after that CJ will give decision in favour of Musharaf with uniform president election .Pubulic and record is witness it was done same as deal.President took back 70% allegation and Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary Saib.

    did same)gave decision in favor of Mushraf that he can participate in election with uniform.

    4. Decision against NRO is not matter but where is justice,Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary Saib did not take any action about billion of rupees remitted by banks in favour of Sharif families and they handed over their minor properties to NAB before going from Pakistan after NRO with Musharaf Saib.

    5. Decision against NRO is not matter but where is justice,Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary,he did not take Sue Motto action against those advocates who abused to Pak Army when he was addressing to Lahore Bar for his restoration.

    6. Decision against NRO is not matter but where is justice,Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary Saib did not take any action against sugar mill owner on sugar prices issue because most were linked with Nawaz league.

    7. Decision against NRO is not matter but where is justice,Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary, where is Sue motto action against his son’s Corrupt

    8. Were is justice about FIR against him self Chief Justice when dozen People were killed in Karachi just because Chief Justice refused to go back from Karachi despite after saying by Govt and wanted the massacre.

    9.Were is justice about recent interview of Peervaiz Ellehe to Hamid Mir Saib on 17-01-10 about 12 Million remitted bank loan for Shabaz Sharif .

    10. Were is justice when cj write final decision of NRO and mentioined Shahabnama, poetry and moral lectures but he did not see himself that one judge can not give or participate in any case which is personalize against judge and in same case president clearly had said that cj is corrupt in his personal case and president will not reinstate him. So this decision is un justice and can not implemented.

    11. Chief justice saib is really great and honest ,sorry above mentioned facts are true but now after reading your NRO decision whole muslin world will prude on CJ that he did not protected himself , did not care himself during writing this decision against NRO,as CJ mentioned that all self created decision of Attorney General including about ending case of Switzerland was wrong and all decision are canceled ,so clearly 70% allegations against CJ Ifthekhar before first time reinstatement was taken back by Attorney General of Musharaf GOVT. So now case against CJ has been reopened again because that order also has been canceled . Due to back of 70% allegations CJ was exonerated by the Bench.

    12. Justice Qayum should have mentioned point No.11 in his review petition but most advocates has no awareness about the law that how to fight under law..

  • dilawer |

    . WRONG IS WRONG AND RESULT IS WRONG

    PLEASE READ IT AND REPLY ONLY IN YES YOU HAVE READ THANKS.

    ONE NAIB QAS ID OR SCALE 1 SERVANT CAN NOT BE APPOINTED IF HE HAS NEGATIVITY IN PAST HOW COULD BE CJ OF PAKISTAN.

    17. Please don’t destroy your self and do not say words which are not justiceful. Because according to Hadith all words are accumulated and same returns to its speaker.AND where justice will not be observed there severe punishment by the God could be seen. If person ,home or any will do they will face but if judge will do injustice whole nation will bear AZAB.

    SIR YOU ARE HONEST, PROFESSIONAL , IT IS NOT NORMAL THING IN OUR SOCIETY WE MUST PROUD AND PAY THANKS TO ALLAH BUT REAL PAY OF THANKS IS TO SEE ALL ASPECTS AND DO ON MERIT EACH AND EVERY THING.TODAY ON TV PROGRAMME YOU HAVE ASKED QUESTION THAT WHY WE ARE HEARING CONSPIRECY AGAINST REINSTATED JUDGE CJ CH IFTEHKHAR SAIB.

    YES THESE THING WILL BE HAPPENED BECAUSE WE DID WRONG AND IT IS NATURE,ALL RELIGONS AND ISLAMIC RULES THAT NEGATIVE AND WRONG THING COULD NOT GET POSITIVE RESULT.

    WHAT WE DID.

    1 CH NISSAR CLEARLY SAID IN N.A SESSION THAT CH CJ DID UN JUSTICE WITH THEM.

    2 PRESIDENT ZARDARI SAID HE HIS PERSONALLY VICTIM OF CJ'S CURRPTION.

    3 OPPOSITION LEADER JAVAID HASHMI CLEARLY SAID THAT CH CJ DID UN JUSTICE WITH HIM.

    4.DURILNG ELECTION PEOPLE CLEARLY GAVE VERDICT AGAINST CJ SUPPORTIVE PARTY MUSLIM LEAGUE N AND BECAME 2ND PARTY AND 3 PROVINCES REJECTED HIM DUE TO OATH ON ONE ISSUE.

    5. PEOPLE REJECTED THE OPPOSITION CALL AND PARTICIPATED IN ELECTION.

    6. on 15 march th RESPECTIVE ALI KURD SAIB WHOLE DAY VISITED TO THE WHOLE BALOUCHISTAN AND SAID THAT IT IS PROVINCE OF AKBAR BUGHATI, KURDD FAIMLY AND CJ IFTHAEKHAR SAIB BUT ONLY 300 PEOPLE CAME WITH HIM.. PEOPLE OF BALOUCHISTAN HAS GIVEN CLEAR DECISION AGAINST THE CJ, IFTHEKHAR CH. DID NOT PARTICAPATED BY THE JAMAT ISLAMI PEOPLE AND ALSO NOT PARTICIPATED BY THE PEOPLE OF BALOUCHISTAN.

    3. IN BALOUCHISTAN THERE WAS NO 144 NO ANY RISTRITION FROM ANY CORNER.

    3. IN KARACHI THERE WAS NO RESRICTION FOR PARTICIPANT AND EVERY ONE HAV HAS SEEN THAT ONLY 800 PEOPLE CAME AT SOHRAB GOTH.

    4. CAMERA IS WITNESS OF THIS WHOLE STORY AND PLEASE MENTION THESES THINGS IF YOU BELIEVE ON JUSTICE AND LOVE TO PAKISTAN

    5. IT IS AGAIN PROVED SAME LIKE ELECTION VERDICT IN WHICH PEOPLE DID NOT GIVE VOTE FOR THOSE PARTY (M—N) AND ALSO DID NOT ACCEPTED THE BOYCOT OF ELECTION

    (3)

    3. MARCH DEMONSTRATION WAS PARTIES CALL WHICH IS NOT VERDICT OF PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN .THESE TYPE DEMONSTRATION EACH AND EVERY PARTY CAN DEMONSTRATED.

    BUT WHAT IS GOING ON NOW.

    SAME RESULT WHICH WE DID WRONG AND WE GET WRONG IT IS UNDER STOOD. IN NATURE

    18. Please don’t destroy your self and do not say words which are not justiceful. Because according to Hadith all words are accumulated and same returns to its speaker.AND where justice will not be observed there severe punishment by the God could be seen. If person ,home or any will do they will face but if judge will do injustice whole nation will bear AZAB.

    4. CH CJ IS MEETING WITH POLITICAL PEOPLE LIKE SFDAR ABBASI PPP AND OTHERS IT IS WRONG.

    5. .ONE POLITICAL ADVOCATE DAILY DECTATING TO CH CJ.

    6. JUSTICE RAMDAY CLEARLY PROMISED THAT HE WILL TAKE RETIREMENT AFTER REINSTATMENT BUT CJ CH IS SAYING TO RAMDAY SAIB THAT HE SHOULD DO AGIANST HIS DECISSION AND NOT TAKE RETIREMENT.

    WE ARE NOT ON RIGHT WAY WE SHOULD HAVE STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIARY BUT WE DID SOME THING FOR FRIENDSHIP WHIH IS WRONG AND RESULT WILL BE WRONG IT IS UNDERSTOOD.

    PLEASE PUPLISH MY VIEW IN YOUR ARTICLE AS LETTER WRITTEER IT WILL BE JUSTICE WITH THE PAKISTAN AND PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN.

    WE ARE JUST SEEING NOT MENTIONING, OBSERVING ANY THING ON MERIT . SINCE LONG LONG TIME BENZIR PROMISE HAS BEEN HIGHLIGHTENED THAT SHE PROMISTED TO RESTORE THE CJ IFTHEKHAR BUT WHAT IS REALITY WE ARE NOT CONSIDERING IT. MEDIA PEOPLE ARE REAL SCHOOL TO EDUCATE THE PEOPLE ON MERIT AND I OBSERVED MEDIA PEOPLE 99% ARE HUMANE, HUMAN.AS PROOF I CAN SAY THAT WHAT TYPE OF DIFFICULTIES MEDIA PEOPLE FACED LIKE HAMID MIR ,KAMRAN KHAN AND OTHERS BUT THEY DID NOT USE LANGUAGE LIKE IMRAN KHAN AND LIKE OTHERS WHO ARE INSTIGATING TO PEOPLE FOR ROIT AGAINST THE PAKISTAN. PLEASE YOU SHOULD PRESENT EACH EVERY THING BUT WITH POSITIVE NEGATIVE ASPECT NOT AS NOT FINALISED DECISION.

    1.BENZIR SHAHEED PROMISE WAS BEFORE ELECTION AND AFTER ELECTION PEOPLE VERDICET CAME AGAINST THE JUDGES ISSUE 50 SEATS GOT Q LEAGUE.

    2. FULL SUPPORTIVE PARTY MUSLIM LEAGUE N LOST THE ELECTION NOT BECAME AS LARGEST PARTY .AND ALSO DID NOT GIVE VOTE THREE SMALL PROVINCES TO MUSLIM LEAGE PARTY N.

    3. MQM ALSO AGAINST THE CJ IFTHEKAR CH.

    4. ADVOCATES ALSO GOT DEFEET FORM PEOPLE AND PEOPLE PARTICIPATED IN ELECTION NOT BY COTTED.

    5 45 JUDGES WERE NOT CURRPT AND THEY FELT AND OBSERVED THE CECISION OF PAKISTANI PEOPLE AND GAVE FULL HOUOUR TO PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN AND TOOK OTHE AGAIN UNDER THE DECOMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT.

    6 45 JUDGES ARE IN MAJORITY ARE 3 JUDGES. BECAUSE THOSE 45 WERE HONEST AND ALSO AGAINST THE PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT.

    THIS WAS GREAT VERDICT OF PEOPLE AGAINST THE CH IFTHEKAHAR. AND AFTER ELECTION BENZIR SHAHEED COUD NOT GO AGAINST THE VERDICT OF PEOPLE. AND ANY PUBLIC PROMISE CAN NOT BE FULFILLED AGAINST THE VERDICT OF PEOPLE.

    7 45 JUDGES WERE NOT CURRPT AND THEY FELT AND OBSERVED THE DECISION OF PAKISTANI PEOPLE AND GAVE FULL HOUOUR TO PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN AND TOOK OTHE AGAIN UNDER THE DECOMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT.

    8 45 JUDGES ARE IN MAJORITY ARE 3 JUDGES. BECAUSE THOSE 45 WERE HONEST AND ALSO AGAINST THE PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT.

    AS ALL JUDGES SUPPORTERS HAVE SAID.

    PLEASE PUPLISH MY VIEW IN YOUR ARTICLE AS LETTER WRITTEER IT WILL BE JUSTICE WITH THE PAKISTAN AND PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN.

    1 CJ SAIB REFUSED TO ATTEND 23 MARCH PRESIDENT CEREMONY DUE DO SHOWIN THAT HE IS NOT INVOLVED IN CURRPTION BUT MEETING WITH SAFDAR ABBASI PPP LEADER IS NOT CURRPRION

    POLITICAL ADVOCATE ETHZAZ MEETING AND DICTATION IS NOT CURRPTION.

    PLEASE CHECK AND SEE WRONG IS WRONG NO POSITIVE RESULT IN FUTURE IT IS NATURE RULE THAT PAST IS THE BASE FORE FUTURE .

    BENIZIR SHAHED PROMISE ABOUT CJ IFTHEKHAR CH AND VERDICT OF PAKISTANI PEOPLE IN ELECTION GAVE DECISSION AGAINST JUDGES RESTORATIOIN BY PPP.

    WE ARE JUST SEEING NOT MENTIONING, OBSERVING ANY THING ON MERIT . SINCE LONG LONG TIME BENZIR PROMISE HAS BEEN HIGHLIGHTENED THAT SHE PROMISTED TO RESTORE THE CJ IFTHEKHAR BUT WHAT IS REALITY WE ARE NOT CONSIDERING IT. MEDIA PEOPLE ARE REAL SCHOOL TO EDUCATE THE PEOPLE ON MERIT AND I OBSERVED MEDIA PEOPLE 99% ARE HUMANE, HUMAN.AS PROOF I CAN SAY THAT WHAT TYPE OF DIFFICULTIES MEDIA PEOPLE FACED LIKE HAMID MIR ,KAMRAN KHAN AND OTHERS BUT THEY DID NOT USE LANGUAGE LIKE IMRAN KHAN AND LIKE OTHERS WHO ARE INSTIGATING TO PEOPLE FOR ROIT AGAINST THE PAKISTAN. PLEASE YOU SHOULD PRESENT EACH EVERY THING BUT WITH POSITIVE NEGATIVE ASPECT NOT AS NOT FINALISED DECISION.

    1.BENZIR SHAHEED PROMISE WAS BEFORE ELECTION AND AFTER ELECTION PEOPLE VERDICET CAME AGAINST THE JUDGES ISSUE 50 SEATS GOT Q LEAGUE.

    2. FULL SUPPORTIVE PARTY MUSLIM LEAGUE N LOST THE ELECTION NOT BECAME AS LARGEST PARTY .AND ALSO DID NOT GIVE VOTE THREE SMALL PROVINCES TO MUSLIM LEAGE PARTY N.

    3. MQM ALSO AGAINST THE CJ IFTHEKAR CH.

    4. ADVOCATES ALSO GOT DEFEET FORM PEOPLE AND PEOPLE PARTICIPATED IN ELECTION NOT BY COTTED.

    9 45 JUDGES WERE NOT CURRPT AND THEY FELT AND OBSERVED THE CECISION OF PAKISTANI PEOPLE AND GAVE FULL HOUOUR TO PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN AND TOOK OTHE AGAIN UNDER THE DECOMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT.

    10 45 JUDGES ARE IN MAJORITY ARE 3 JUDGES. BECAUSE THOSE 45 WERE HONEST AND ALSO AGAINST THE PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT.

    THIS WAS GREAT VERDICT OF PEOPLE AGAINST THE CH IFTHEKAHAR. AND AFTER ELECTION BENZIR SHAHEED COUD NOT GO AGAINST THE VERDICT OF PEOPLE. AND ANY PUBLIC PROMISE CAN NOT BE FULFILLED AGAINST THE VERDICT OF PEOPLE.

    11 45 JUDGES WERE NOT CURRPT AND THEY FELT AND OBSERVED THE DECISION OF PAKISTANI PEOPLE AND GAVE FULL HOUOUR TO PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN AND TOOK OTHE AGAIN UNDER THE DECOMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT.

    12 45 JUDGES ARE IN MAJORITY ARE 3 JUDGES. BECAUSE THOSE 45 WERE HONEST AND ALSO AGAINST THE PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT.

    AS ALL JUDGES SUPPORTERS HAVE SAID.

    PLEASE PUPLISH MY VIEW IN YOUR ARTICLE AS LETTER WRITTEER IT WILL BE JUSTICE WITH THE PAKISTAN AND PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN.

  • Jalal |

    wtf?!CJ might not have an impeccable persona but his actions speak louder than any words Mr NB or others on the forum might churn out!However, Dr Arsalan's appointment to Police is the only solid case against CJ and that too is still dubious!

    Im taking CSS exam and i know how hard it is for average people to compete. If CJ daughter's case for Medical College Admission can stir a storm in media,why not CJ iftikhar's sons case that is more severe?!

  • Anjum Zia |

    For The attention of Mr. Naeem Bokhari

    Dear Naeem Bokhari

    Sir

    I am a pakistani born and moved to london in 1989, for the last 21 years living in london. God almighty has blessed me with 2 Sons one is 17 years old and the other one is 11 years. They love pakistan more then anything else. I want you to guide and if you can send your email address so they can get in touch with you. if you can text me your email address at my mobile 00447578290885 or 00447401361887.

    Kind Regards

    Anjum Zia

  • taj |

    It is unfortunate that our media is highly politicized and played with issues on selective basis. No doubt CJ played heroic role when he refused to bow before military. But it does not mean that he treat all others with contempt. His past record is not that good. He took oath under PCO and give unjustified decisions in favour of military government but when the generals target him, he shown some resilience. When he decided against 2nd PCO judges he closed his eyes from his own unlawful and illegal first PCO oath. As a judge who claimed to decide on high moral grounds, he should have resigned becasue if 2nd oath was wrong then how could first be right. He is also silent on some serous allegations that he took unlawful and illegal favours for his son. From his observations in open court it appears as if he thinks that only he is a right and honest person in whole state of Pakistan. He is darling of certain media groups because they are using him for their vested interests. Further he is also favoured and supported by our rightist and conservative elements. I am afraid that under his lordship our supreme court would become more and more conservative.

  • Amjad Mustafa |

    It is rather late to comment but I just read this letter when a lot of water has passed under the bridge. As a human being, Naeem Bokhari spoke his mind and he had every right to do so. If anything he said was not correct he should have been told so in a civilized manner. Everyone should have the courage to speak his mind.